Recommender Questions for Programs that start in 2022

Important Notes
It is essential that you check the school website for the most accurate, complete and up-to-date information.
Especially if you are a re-applicant.

The recommenders should work on the official form, either hardcopy, or online. They should not go by the information contained on this page alone.

Sometimes schools change the questions mid-season, so be aware, and have your recommenders be aware they should verify the questions before submitting their answers.

Pay attention to the word limits.

Something changed? Any comments? Please update us: [email protected]

INSTRUCTIONS

Here are the how, who, what, where, when and why of recommendations:

  • How & How Many: Fill out the details within the Recommenders section below. Two recommendations are required for new applicants and one new recommendation is required for reapplicants (you may ask an individual who submitted a recommendation for you in a prior year to submit a new one). If you need to change your recommender or their e-mail, click “Exclude” (warning: recommender will lose all work already entered) and re-enter via Add Recommender.
  • Who: Choose recommenders who can speak to your work performance, capabilities, and potential for graduate studies and future career success. Use your best judgment on whom to ask for a recommendation — direct supervisors are generally preferred, and other options could include current or past supervisors/managers, professional colleagues, and clients (peers, family members, and professors are generally not good selections).
  • What: The recommendation form asks recommenders to evaluate your strengths and areas of growth, plus rate you across a variety of metrics. You can see a sample form here.
  • Where: Recommendation forms can only be sent and received electronically so your recommender must have a valid e-mail address.
  • When: Recommendations should be submitted by the round deadline in which you are applying, and it is your responsibility to ensure we receive recommendations in time. To send a reminder to a recommender, click on the Edit link next to their name and then click the Send Reminder button at the bottom of the pop-up screen. We encourage you to contact your recommenders as soon as possible to give them sufficient time (the recommender’s access code is valid for 180 days from the date you save their information).
  • Why: We are interested in learning more about your professional past performance, future potential, and overall fit from individuals who have worked closely with you.

QUESTIONS

Recommender Information

  • Context of Relationship (select)
  • Recommender’s relationship to applicant (select)
  • How long have you known the applicant? (select)
  • During which period of time have you had the most frequent contact with the applicant? From: To:
  • If you are affiliated with UCLA, please select the option that most closely matches. (select)

Competency Ratings

for each trait, select: No Basis ; Below Average ; Average (top 50%) ; Good (top 25%) ; Excellent (top 10%)

  • Interpersonal Skills
  • Professional Maturity
  • Resilience
  • Self-Confidence
  • Communication
  • Analytical & Problem-Solving
  • Motivation & Initiative
  • Work Quality
  • Teamwork
  • Leadership Potential

Is there anything about your competency ratings on which you would like to comment? (optional) (textbox)

Comments and Examples

Please answer the following questions and provide specific examples where possible.

1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization. (textbox, Recommended word count: 50 words)

2. How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? e.g., what are the applicant’s principal strengths? (textbox, Recommended word count: 300 words)

3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (textbox, Recommended word count: 300 words)

4. Is there anything else we should know? (optional)
Upload doc, Or, type or copy-and-paste your document here: (textbox)

Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this candidate compared to their peer group? (select)

Overall, I … (select)

INSTRUCTIONS

Please submit letters of recommendation from two individuals who know you well and can offer specific examples of your performance at and contributions to an organization. Avoid choosing recommenders based on their title or status. We are more concerned with content and substance rather than reputation.

One letter of recommendation should come from a supervisor. We are looking for objectivity in the letter, and we want to hear from someone who can assess both your strengths and your weaknesses.

We prefer to hear from a current supervisor, although we understand that this may not be possible. If you are unable to ask your current supervisor, please explain the circumstances in the optional essay.
If you work for a family business or own your own company, please submit a letter from a client or outside party who does business with you and can provide an objective assessment.
The other letter can come from another professional contact or from someone who has worked with you in an organization or club, or on a volunteer project. This letter can offer a different perspective on your skill sets outside of your professional environment.

We have no preference regarding who supplies your second letter of recommendation.
Our only guideline is that it should add new and valuable insight to your candidacy.

The recommendation form is part of the online application. You will be prompted to provide the names and email addresses of your recommenders, and we’ll send them an email directing them to the online form. Chicago Booth does not accept letters of recommendation via mail or fax.

We require every applicant to provide two letters of recommendation. These letters MUST be submitted via our online system. To ensure the objectivity and validity of your recommendations, the written product must be entirely your recommenders’ work. Although you may discuss the recommendations with them, you may not have any involvement in drafting or submitting them.

One letter should come from a current supervisor, who can assess both your strengths and your weaknesses. If you are unable to ask your current supervisor, please explain below. The other letter can come from another professional contact or from someone who has worked with you in an organization or club, or on a volunteer project.

QUESTIONS

Reference Information

  • Reference Relationship (select)
  • How long have you known the applicant? ______
  • Do you have an MBA degree? (select)
  • Are you in any way affiliated with The University of Chicago or Chicago Booth? (select)

Skills Assessment

Please assess the candidate’s skills in the following areas. Your honest and candid assessment greatly helps the Admissions Committee in evaluating the candidate.
Most candidates will have a range of marks; it is extremely rare for a candidate to exceed expectations in all areas.

For each skill below mark: Unable to Assess ; Area of Concern ; Opportunity for Development ; Solid/Meets Expectations ; Strength/ Exceeds Expectations ; Ability to adapt to change

  • Ability to adapt to change
  • Self-awareness
  • Demonstration of empathy for others
  • Maturity
  • Openness to feedback and constructive criticism
  • Interpersonal skills (with colleagues/subordinates)
  • Interpersonal skills (with superiors/executives)
  • Confidence
  • Initiative/Self-Motivation
  • Collaboration/Teamwork
  • Critical Thinking Skills
  • Intellectual Curiosity
  • Problem Solving Skills

Peer Comparison

Based on your professional experience, how does the applicant rate within his or her peer group? (select)

Please indicate the reference group for this comparison: _________

Overall, I: (select)

Letter of Recommendation

Please provide a written letter of recommendation in support of the applicant addressing the following questions:

1. How do the applicant’s performance, potential, background or personal qualities compare to those of other well-qualified candidates in similar roles? Please provide specific examples.

2. Please describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response.

(UPLOAD DOC)

INSTRUCTIONS

First-time applicants require one recommendation. Reapplicants are required to submit one new recommendation. If you have been working full-time for at least six months, your recommendation should ideally be from your current supervisor. If you are unable to secure a recommendation from your direct supervisor, please submit a statement of explanation in the Employment section of your application. Beyond your direct supervisor, other recommender options include: a former direct supervisor or another professional associate, senior to you, who can share their insights on your candidacy.
If you have worked full-time for fewer than six months, your recommendation should be from a person who can comment on your managerial abilities. You may ask a summer employer or another person whom you feel can objectively assess your professional promise. If you are a college senior, we encourage you to apply for the Deferred Enrollment Program.
Please note that Columbia Business School and several of our peer institutions use similar, if not identical, recommendation questions. This is an effort on our part to make the process easier for your recommender. We expect that you, the applicant, will not participate in the drafting of your recommendation. Applications are not considered complete until all required information is submitted; this includes your recommendation.

Please enter information for one individual you wish to submit a recommendation on your behalf. They should be able to speak directly about your performance and professional promise.
To complete your application, you must submit one recommendation letter. If you are a reapplicant, please be sure this is one new recommendation letter.
If you have been working full-time for at least six months, your recommendation should ideally be from your current supervisor. If you are unable to secure a recommendation from your direct supervisor, please submit a statement of explanation in the Employment section of your application. Beyond your direct supervisor, other recommender options include: a former direct supervisor or another professional associate, senior to you, who can share their insights on your candidacy.
If you have worked full-time for fewer than six months, your recommendation should be from a person who can comment on your managerial abilities. You may ask a summer employer or another person whom you feel can objectively assess your professional promise. If you are a college senior, we encourage you to apply for the Deferred Enrollment Program.

Please note:
We expect that you, the applicant, will not participate in the drafting of your recommendation.
Applications are not considered complete until all required information is submitted; this includes your recommendation, which must be submitted no later than two weeks after the date that you submit your application.
Make sure that you and your recommender adjust spam filters to allow emails from [email protected]

QUESTIONS

Recommendation Upload

Please consider the following guidelines when writing your recommendation:

1. How do the candidate’s performance, potential, background, or personal qualities compare to those of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? Please provide specific examples.

2. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response.

Limit your recommendation to 1000 words. Please submit your recommendation as a PDF or Word document.

MBA applicants are required to submit one professional letter of recommendation.

Below are instructions for writing your letter of recommendation:

Core Competency Rating:

In a letter of no more than 700 words, your recommendation should address the following list of attributes based on your experience with the applicant:

  • Appraisal of academic and interpersonal abilities – Examples: Quantitative aptitude, teamwork, dependability, leadership, motivation
  • Technical aptitude and/or professional experiences in tech – Examples: Specific programming and data structure platforms, entrepreneurship, innovation
  • For LLM Candidates Only: Legal practice experience – Examples: In-house or law firm practice, government or policy work, clinic or internship participation, practice management, legal tech experience
  • Project and Team-based activities? – Examples: Leadership, time management, communication, conflict resolution, technical documentation and research
  • Areas of improvement – Provide an example of when you provided the applicant feedback and describe that interaction?

If you have issues submitting your letter, you can email the letter to [email protected]

Please upload your recommendation letter below. (upload file)

INSTRUCTIONS

The recommendation is an opportunity for us to hear from someone other than you regarding your candidacy. The recommendation is the one part of your application you will not fill out yourself. Recommendations are typically the slowest part of the application process, so identify your recommenders well in advance of your target deadline.

Identifying Your Recommender:

We require one recommendation as part of our application process. Candidates may include a second recommendation with their materials, if desired. However, you will want to be sure this additional recommender is offering new insights regarding you and your candidacy.

Consider choosing someone who knows you well and has supervised you in a professional setting and directly observed your work (typically within the last few years). Identify someone who will help us learn more about your accomplishments and leadership potential through specific examples and anecdotes. Strictly academic recommendations are typically less helpful in our evaluation.

Our recommendation process is completely electronic, and your recommenders will fill out two pieces of information — a ratings grid in which they will evaluate you across a set of competencies and a series of short answer questions. The short answer questions are:

Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization.
How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles?
Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response.
About the Recommendation Process:

Once you enter your recommender’s information and contact details, they will receive an email with a link to our recommendation materials. Occasionally, this email gets caught in spam filter and does not reach the recommender. In this situation, simply contact our Admissions team ([email protected]) and we will re-send the recommendation link to your recommender.

Our recommendation process is completely electronic, and your recommendation will automatically associate with your application once the recommendation is submitted. In other words, once you have finished your portion of the application, you may go ahead and submit your materials. However, once you have submitted your application, you will be unable to edit your application or enter additional recommender information.

We find that most recommenders are deadline-oriented, so be sure to stay in touch to make sure they know your application timing. You will receive an email notification once your recommender submits their recommendation. You will also notice a green check mark next to their name and information on your Application Status page (a red “X” will display if the recommendation is still pending).

Please provide one recommendation from an individual whom you believe can speak directly to your aptitude and capabilities for graduate study and for future success as a manager. You may submit up to two recommenders, if desired. We encourage you to let your recommendation writer know about your interest in Darden and remind them of your accomplishments but you should not participate in the writing of your letters.

Choose a recommender who knows you well, has directly observed your work (ideally within the last few years), and who will take the time to write a thorough, detailed document with specific anecdotes and examples. Strictly academic recommendations are generally less helpful in our evaluation. The Admissions Committee focuses on the content of the recommendation, not on the title/position of the individual who provides it (i.e., we strongly prefer comments from a direct manager as opposed to comments from a more senior individual who has little firsthand knowledge of you).
When you enter your recommender’s contact information, you will be asked to confirm that you did not write any portion of the recommendation, either in whole or in part, or have any involvement in its drafting or submission.
We prefer that you use your recommender’s institutional or corporate email address however we understand that your recommender may prefer to use a personal email address. Submissions from email addresses such as Gmail, Hotmail, and Yahoo may be subject to additional review. Please tell your recommenders to set their email filters to allow emails from “@darden.virginia.edu”.
We have found that emails sent to certain organizations such as some government agencies and consulting firms will be blocked. You can submit a personal email address for your recommender if necessary.
Recommendations that require conversion to English should be translated by a Certified Translation Service.
If you applied in a previous application period, you are required to submit a new recommendation from an individual who can speak to your professional and personal development since your last application.
Contact your recommenders now! The most common reason an application is incomplete and/or misses a deadline is because we have not received one or both recommendations.

QUESTIONS

Section 1 – Recommender Information

  • Context of Relationship
  • Nature of relationship
  • How long have you known the applicant?
  • During which period of time have you had the most frequent contact with the applicant? From: To:
  • Please select the option(s) that most closely matches your affiliation with Darden or the University of Virginia, if one exists.
  • May we contact you regarding this applicant?
  • Did you use a translator?

Section 2

In this section, you will find 12 competencies and character traits that contribute to successful leadership. The competencies and character traits are grouped into five categories:
– Achievement
– Influence
– People
– Personal Qualities
– Cognitive Abilities

For each competency, please highlight the selection that corresponds to the behavior that you have seen the applicant most consistently exhibit. We acknowledge that all applicants have both areas of strength and areas of development. Your candid and honest appraisal will assist in evaluating the applicant. Please assume that each level builds upon behaviors of the previous level.

Achievement

1. Initiative: Acts ahead of need/anticipates problems

2. Results Orientation: Focuses on and drives toward delivering on goals, objectives, and performance improvement

Influence

3. Communication, Professional Impression & Poise: Delivers messages and ideas in a way that engages an audience and achieves buy-in; uses listening and other attending behaviors to reach shared understanding; remains calm and measured even in time of crisis or conflict

4. Influence and Collaboration: Engages and works with people over whom one has no direct control

People

5. Respect for Others: Acknowledges the value of others’ views and actions

6. Team Leadership: Manages and empowers a team of formal or informal direct reports, including virtual teams

7. Developing Others: Helps people develop their performance and ability over time

Personal Qualities

8. Trustworthiness/ Integrity: Acts consistently in line with or follows explicit values, beliefs or intentions

9. Adaptability/ Resilience: Adapts to changing demands and circumstances without difficulty. Maintains calm optimism in the face of challenge, problems, or apparent failure

10. Self Awareness: Aware of and seeks out additional input on own strengths and weaknesses

Cognitive

11. Problem Solving: Frames problems, analyzes situations, identifies key issues, conducts analysis on the issues, and produces acceptable solution

12. Strategic Orientation: Thinks beyond one’s span of control and into the future to reshape the approach or scope of work

(Optional) Is there anything about your competency ratings on which you would like to comment? (textbox)
Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this candidate compared to her/his peer group? (select)
Overall, I … (select)

Section 3

Please answer the following questions and provide specific examples where possible.

1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization. (textbox, Word limit: 50 words)

2. How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? (E.g. what are the applicant’s principal strengths?) (textbox, Recommended word count: 500 words)

3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (textbox, Recommended word count: 500 words)

(Optional) Is there anything else we should know?
Upload document, Or, type or copy-and-paste your document here: (textbox)

INSTRUCTIONS

Two recommendation letters must be submitted as part of the application process. These can be from professional and/or academic referees, although we recommend that both be from professional sources. Your recommendation letters will be used to evaluate your global mindset and personal motivation.
You will need to introduce your referees’ information in your online application form. Once you have completed and saved this section of the form, your referees will receive an automatic request to submit your recommendation letter.

QUESTIONS

1. How long have you known the candidate? In which context? (textbox, max. 1000 characters)

2. What do you consider to be the candidate’s most noteworthy qualities? (textbox, max. 500 characters)

3. What are the areas in which you believe the candidate needs to improve? (textbox, max. 500 characters)

4. Please comment on the candidate’s potential for management. Describe an occasion in which you observed the candidate in a leadership role. (textbox, max. 500 characters)

Please give us your opinion in terms of the following criteria: (for each, select from drop-down: exceptional ; good ; average ; poor ; unobserved)

  • Leadership potential
  • Organizational skills
  • Teamwork
  • Maturity
  • Self-confidence
  • Creativity

Additional Comments

Please add information on the ratings you have assigned and make any additional comments about the applicant’s motivation, ability, leadership potential or any personal qualities you would like the Admissions Committee to take into account. (max. 32000 characters)

Upload additional supporting letter here (upload file)

INSTRUCTIONS

All recommenders are required to use the common letter of recommendation form associated with the online application. An application may be submitted, but will not be considered “complete” until we have received your recommendation(s).
The most valuable recommendations come from individuals who know you well in either an academic or professional setting. Recommendations from relatives or family friends are discouraged by the Admissions Committee.
In addition to the professional recommendation, if you have a Fuqua alum or current student who would like to submit an endorsement on your behalf, they may complete our endorsement form (https://admissions.fuqua.duke.edu/register/?id=2c0d233d-31b3-47cf-bff4-4081d1fd2f41) telling us why you would be an asset to our program. Our alumni know what it takes to be successful at Fuqua and we welcome alumni endorsements of your candidacy. Please note, endorsement forms are not required and only provide compelling support for a candidate when they are written by an alum or current student who knows you well.
One letter of recommendation is required. The most valuable recommendations come from people who know your professional skills and abilities. We require that you submit one recommendation from your current supervisor. If you do not have an immediate supervisor, you may submit a recommendation from someone who knows you well in your current position and can critique your professional performance. If you are unable to provide a professional recommendation, please clarify in the text box below. You may also choose to submit an additional recommendation from someone who knows you well and can speak to your performance in a professional setting.

QUESTIONS

Section 1 – Recommender Information

  • Context of Relationship (select)
  • Nature of relationship (select)
  • How long have you known the applicant? (select)
  • During which period of time have you had the most frequent contact with the applicant? From: To:
  • Please select the option that most closely matches your affiliation with The Fuqua School of Business or Duke University, if any, or else select Not affiliated. (select)
  • May we contact you regarding this applicant? (select)
  • Did you use a translator? (select)

Section 2

In this section, you will find 16 competencies and character traits that contribute to successful leadership. The competencies and character traits are grouped into five categories:

– Achievement
– Influence
– People
– Personal Qualities
– Cognitive Abilities

For each competency, please select the one button that corresponds to the behavior that you have seen the applicant most consistently exhibit. We acknowledge that all applicants have both areas of strength and areas of development. Your candid and honest appraisal will assist in evaluation of the applicant. Please assume that each level builds upon behaviors of the previous level.

Achievement

1. Initiative: Acts ahead of need/anticipates problems

0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Reluctant to take on new tasks; waits to be told what to do; defers to others
2 – Willing to step in and take charge when required to do so
3 – Takes charge spontaneously when problem needs attention
4 – Volunteers for new work challenges; proactively puts in extra effort to accomplish critical or difficult tasks
5 – Proactively seeks high-impact projects; steps up to challenges even when things are not going well

2. Results Orientation: Focuses on and drives toward delivering on goals, objectives, and performance improvement

0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Focuses on fulfilling activities at hand; unsure how work relates to goals
2 – Takes actions to overcome obstacles to achieve goals
3 – Independently acts to exceed goals and plans for contingencies
4 – Documents activities and outcomes to learn from past; introduces incremental improvements to raise the effectiveness of team
5 – Invents new approaches with measurably better results; works to deliver best-in-class performance improvements

Influence

3. Communication, Professional Impression & Poise: Delivers messages and ideas in a way that engages an audience and achieves buy-in; uses listening and other attending behaviors to reach shared understanding; remains calm and measured even in time of crisis or conflict

0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Struggles to get point across; neglects to understand audience’s input or perspective; lacks confidence and gets flustered under pressure
2 – Works to get point across; acknowledges feedback; reframes statements when necessary to make them clearer; speaks politely; remains composed in known circumstances
3 – Present views clearly and logically structures content for a broad audience; listens and responds to feedback; prepares in advance to appear confident; leaves a positive and professional impression; responds confidently in unfamiliar situations
4 – Uses tailored language that appeals to specific groups; restates what others have said to check for understanding; comes across as confident; responds rapidly and strongly to crisis; looked to for advice and guidance
5-Structures content for senior-level meetings; maintains composure when challenged; solicits opinions & concerns, discusses them openly and adjusts communication; remains cool under pressure during conflict or crisis; channels emotion into positive action

4. Influence and Collaboration: Engages and works with people over whom one has no direct control

0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Does not seek input and perspective of others
2 – Accepts input from others and engages them in problem solving
3 – Seeks first to understand perspectives of others; takes actions to gain their support for ideas and initiatives
4 – Uses tailored approaches to connect with others, influence, and achieve results
5 – Uses tailored influence approaches to create and leverage a network of strategically chosen individuals to improve collective outcomes

People

5. Respect for Others: Acknowledges the value of others’ views and actions

0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Unwilling to acknowledge others’ points of view
2 – Open to considering others’ views when confronted or offered
3 – Invites input from others because of expressed respect for them and their views
4 – Praises people publicly for their good actions; ensures that others’ opinions are heard before their own
5 – Uses empathy and personal experience to resolve conflicts and foster mutual respect; reinforces respect with public praise when individuals solicit and use input from others

6. Team Leadership: Manages and empowers a team of formal or informal direct reports, including virtual teams

0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Struggles to delegate effectively (e.g. micromanages); does not organize activities or provide appropriate information to complete tasks
2 – Assigns tasks and tells people what to do; checks when they are done
3 – Solicits ideas and perspectives from the team; structures activities; holds members accountable
4 – Actively engages the team to develop plans and resolve issues through collaboration; shows the impact of individual/team contributions
5 – Recruits others into duties or roles based on insight into individual abilities; rewards those who exceed expectations; provides strong organizational support

7. Developing Others: Helps people develop their performance and ability over time

0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Focuses only on one’s own growth; critical of others’ efforts to develop
2 – Encourages people to develop; points out mistakes to help people develop and praises them for improvements
3 – Gives specific positive and negative behavioral feedback to support the development of others
4 – Provides overarching practical guiding principles and recommendations that are applicable in multiple situations to direct or focus efforts on specific areas of development
5 – Identifies potential in others; inspires others to develop by providing feedback, mentoring/coaching, and identifying new growth opportunities as well as supporting their effort to change

Personal Qualities

8. Trustworthiness/ Integrity: Acts consistently in line with or follows explicit values, beliefs, or intentions

0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Follows the crowd; takes path of least resistance; gives in under pressure
2 – Acts consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs when it is easy to do so
3 – Acts spontaneously and consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs despite opposition
4 – Initiates actions based on values or beliefs even though the actions may come with reputational risk; demonstrates the values of the team or organization publicly
5 – Demonstrates high personal integrity even at personal cost; holds people accountable to the team or organizational values

9. Adaptability/ Resilience: Adapts to changing demands and circumstances without difficulty. Maintains calm optimism in the face of challenge, problems, or apparent failure

0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Prefers existing ways of doing things; fears failure; becomes anxious under challenging situations
2 – Adapts to new methods and procedures when required to do so; remains calm in unfamiliar situations until confronted with obstacle
3 – Champions adoption of new initiatives and processes; exhibits level-headedness in most environments including challenging ones; persists until obstacle is overcome
4 – Seeks out disruptions as an opportunity for improvement; remains optimistic and forward-looking in difficult situations that may result in failure
5 – Energized by projects with high uncertainty but potential for high reward; seeks to be the first into unknown or unfamiliar situations; welcomes learning opportunities created by failure; learns from mistakes and rebounds quickly from setbacks

10. Self Awareness: Aware of and seeks out additional input on own strengths and weaknesses

0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Lacks awareness of how he/she is perceived; denies or offers excuses when confronted
2 – Acknowledges fault or performance problem when confronted with concrete example or data
3 – Describes own key strengths and weaknesses accurately; welcomes feedback from others and discusses opportunities to change with select individuals
4 – Actively seeks out feedback to explicitly address desired improvement areas or build on strengths; explores reasons for problems openly, including own faults
5 – Seeks out challenging and potentially risky experiences to improve; identifies and engages with resources—people, processes, or content—to maximize strengths or mitigate weaknesses

Cognitive

11. Problem Solving: Frames problems, analyzes situations, identifies key issues, conducts analysis on the issues, and produces acceptable solution

0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Avoids problems; when faced with problems, sticks to what worked before, or chooses an obvious path
2 – Offers solutions when the risk is low; focuses on immediate, short-term implications instead of the big picture
3 – Looks beyond the obvious; identifies and focuses on the critical information needed to understand a problem, identifies root cause(s), and comes up with reasonable solutions
4 – Gathers and analyzes key information using complex methods or several layers deep; integrates perspectives from a variety of sources to arrive at unexpected but practical and effective solutions
5 – Applies logic to break complex problems down into manageable parts or sub-problems; solves tough and interconnected problems and can explain how the pieces are connected

12. Strategic Orientation: Thinks beyond one’s span of control and into the future to reshape the approach or scope of work

0 – No basis for judgment
1 – Focuses on completing work without understanding implications
2 – Understands immediate issues or implications of work or analysis
3 – Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have improved near-term business performance
4 – Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have shaped team/organization strategy and will have impact on long-term business performance
5 – Develops insights or recommendations beyond area of responsibility with impact on long-term business strategy and performance

(Optional) Is there anything about your competency ratings on which you’d like to comment? (textbox)

Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this candidate compared to her/his peer group? (select)

Overall, I … (select)

Section 3

Please answer the following questions and provide specific examples where possible.

1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization. (textbox, Recommended word count: 50 words)

2. How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? (E.g. what are the applicant’s principal strengths?) (textbox, Recommended word count: 500 words)

3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (textbox, Recommended word count: 500 words)

4. (Optional) Is there anything else we should know?
Upload file, Or, type or copy-and-paste your document here: (textbox)

INSTRUCTIONS

Two letters are required, with one from your current direct supervisor.
We require two letters of recommendation and prefer that at least one come from a current employer.
Select individuals with whom you have had considerable professional interaction, such as your supervisor or a major client.
The title or status of those you select is not important. What does matter is how closely your letter writers have worked with you and whether they can attest to your value as an employee, your professional accomplishments, and your personal qualities and interpersonal skills in an organizational context. For this reason, we strongly discourage academic references.
Letters of recommendation from co-workers, someone you have supervised, relatives, or personal and family friends are inappropriate and can be detrimental to the review of your application.
Please do not submit more than two letters, and if you choose not to obtain a letter from your current supervisor, be certain to explain why.
We strongly prefer that MBA candidates provide both letters from current or former employers. If you do not provide a letter from your current direct supervisor, you should include an explanation in the Supplementary Data section of the online application.
Recommenders may submit letters of recommendation online, or by completing, printing, and mailing a hard copy recommendation using this form (https://mba.haas.berkeley.edu/hubfs/eBooks%20and%20Guides/ftmba-letter-of-recommendation.pdf). If the online recommendation is chosen, your recommender will be given access to an online form.
Please only submit two letters of recommendation. Recommendations may be submitted online or through the mail using a PDF version. You will receive an automated message once a recommender has submitted their letter of recommendation. Letters sent via mail must have the letter writer’s signature across the seal of the envelope.
If your recommender is not comfortable writing a letter in English, it is acceptable to obtain the recommendation in the native language of the author. The original letter and an English translation completed by an ATA (American Translators Association) certified translator must be provided through the mail with the letter writer’s signature across the seal of the envelope.
You are responsible for ensuring that recommendations are submitted prior to the application deadline. Please do not draft or write your own letter of recommendation, even if asked to do so by your recommender. This can result in denial of your application or withdrawal of your offer of admission.

QUESTIONS

1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization. (textbox)

2. How does the applicant’s performance compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? Please provide specific examples. (E.g. what are the applicant’s principal strengths?) (textbox)

3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (textbox)

4. In the Berkeley MBA program, we develop leaders who embody our distinctive culture’s four key principles one of which is “confidence without attitude” or “confidence with humility”. Please comment on how the applicant reflects this Berkeley Haas value. (textbox)

5. (Optional) Is there anything else we should know? (textbox)

Please give us your appraisal of the applicant in terms of the traits listed below. Compare the applicant with others whom you know have applied to business school or with individuals who are being groomed for leadership positions within your organization. (for each trait, select from drop-down menu)

  • Results Orientation
  • Strategic Orientation
  • Team Leadership
  • Influence and Collaboration
  • Communication
  • Information Seeking
  • Developing Others
  • Change Leadership
  • Respect for Others
  • Trustworthiness

To what degree do you recommend this applicant be admitted to the Berkeley Full-time MBA Program? (select)

We strongly prefer that you use this form for your recommendation. Alternatively, you may upload a letter of recommendation. (upload file)

INSTRUCTIONS

Please submit two recommendations (no more, no less!) from individuals who can speak directly about your professional performance and promise. Recommendations must be completed online.

Who should I choose to be my recommenders? The Admissions Committee suggests (but does not require) that one recommendation be from your direct supervisor. Sorry to repeat ourselves, but this is a guideline, not a requirement. We are very aware that not all candidates will be able to do this.

The other recommendation should be from someone who can comment on your leadership skills and/or potential; this may be a former supervisor, another professional associate, or a university professor. Use your best judgment on who you decide to ask – there is no set formula for who should be your recommenders.

Worth mentioning here, because we are asked this a lot: No, we don’t give special consideration to recommendations written by HBS alums, and you don’t need to have an HBS recommender to be admitted. (Most admitted students don’t!)

QUESTIONS

Part 1: Your Information

Do you know this applicant from a previous employer? (select)

Are you a graduate of the Harvard Business School MBA program? (select)

Part 2: Relationship Context

Relationship Type (select)

Relationship Context (select)

Number of applicants you are recommending to the HBS MBA Program this year: _____

Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, their role in your organization: (textbox, 300 characters)

Part 3: Candidate Evaluation

Leadership Attributes

The MBA Admissions Board would like to learn more about the candidate’s strengths and areas of development. For each attribute, please indicate how you have experienced the candidate. We recognize that all candidates are growing professionally and that some of their attributes may be more developed than others. We appreciate your reflection on relative strengths compared to areas the candidate is actively working to develop. To that end, please mark at least one attribute as “Developing” and no more than three attributes as “Distinctive.”

For each attribute mark: No Basis for Judgement / Potential Area of Concern / Developing / Strong / Distinctive

  • Awareness of and respect for others
  • Humility
  • Adaptability and resilience
  • Curiosity
  • Initiative
  • Integrity
  • Interpersonal skills with colleagues and subordinates
  • Interpersonal skills with superiors
  • Professional maturity
  • Self-awareness
  • Self-confidence
  • Teamwork: engagement and collaboration
  • Teamwork: leadership and development of others

Please use this space to comment on the ratings you have assigned. (Optional) (textbox, 500 characters)

Skills Assessment

The MBA Admissions Board is also interested in your evaluation of the candidate’s skills based on the interactions you have had with the candidate. There are no restrictions on the ratings you may assign in this section.

For each skill mark: No Basis for Judgement / Potential Area of Concern / Developing / Meets Expectations / Exceeds Expectations

  • Analytical thinking
  • Listening skills
  • Quantitative skills
  • Verbal communication
  • Written communication
  • Creative problem solving

Please use this space to comment on the skills ratings you have assigned. (Optional) (textbox, 500 characters)

Part 4: Open Response Questions

Please respond to the questions below in a single document.

1. How do the applicant’s performance, potential, background, or personal qualities compare to those of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? Please provide specific examples. (Recommended: 300 words)

2. Please describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (Recommended: 250 words)

3. (Optional) Is there anything else we should know? Please be concise.

(Upload document)

INSTRUCTIONS

You are required to provide us with two referees who can complete a recommendation form. The referees should be individuals well acquainted with your performance in a professional or academic context. Once you have uploaded their contact details they will automatically be contacted by us to fill out an online reference.
Please provide the names and contact information of two referees who will submit reference reports on your behalf.
The reference form will be emailed to each referee, please make sure you choose two referees who are prepared to provide a confidential report on your academic ability and professional qualifications.
Please note that all referees must complete the reference form. Please indicate to your referees that they will receive an email regarding your application which will contain the website address, username and password for them to complete the referee form.
If your referee doesn’t receive the email, please ask them to check their junk mail for messages from [email protected] and add this address to their safe senders list

QUESTIONS

Relationship to candidate:

  1. How long and in what capacity have you known the candidate? (textbox, no limit)
  2. If this is a work related reference, in what position is/was the candidate employed and for how long? (textbox, no limit)

Candidate’s abilities:

Please evaluate the candidate in terms of the qualities below (for each quality, select from drop down: outstanding ; excellent ; very good ; good ; avergae ; below average)

  • Intellectual or academic ability
  • Competence in current position
  • Oral communication skills
  • Written communication skills
  • Analytical skills
  • Leadership skills
  • Teamwork skills
  • Initiative / problem solving skills
  • Creativity / Innovative

Proficiency in English:

Candidate’s first language? (select)

If the candidate’s first language is not English, please comment on his/her level of competence:

  • Written (select)
  • Listening / Comprehension (select)
  • Spoken (select)
  • Reading (select)

Candidate’s strengths and weaknesses:

  1. What do you consider to be the candidate’s principal strengths / talents? (textbox, no limit)
  2. What do you consider to be the candidate’s weaknesses or areas that need improvement? (textbox, no limit)

2 letters of recommendation are required.

Candidate information

How long have you known the candidate?

  • Less than 1 year
  • Between 1 and 4 years
  • Between 5 and 9 years
  • Between 10 and 19 years
  • 20 years or more

What was your relationship with the candidate?

  • I am or have been their partner in a venture
  • I am or have been their direct boss
  • I am or have been their indirect boss or boss of their boss(es)
  • I am or have been their colleague
  • I am or have been his direct or indirect subordinate
  • I am or have been their customer
  • I am or have been a business provider to their organization
  • I am or have been their teacher
  • I am or have been their classmate
  • I am or have been their personal friend
  • Other(s)

In three words, how would you describe the candidate? _________      __________       ___________

From a professional perspective, what stands out about the candidate? (textbox, 500 characters Max)

In your opinion, how would the candidate benefit from the program? (textbox, 500 characters Max)

Additional comments about the candidate (textbox, 500 characters Max)

INSTRUCTIONS

One Letter of recommendation is required. You may register up to 3 recommenders for this application if you consider it necessary.
Please enter the following information to allow your letter writers to submit your recommendations online. It is imperative that you accurately enter the information as your recommender will receive an automated email informing him/her of the online process and the instructions and questions on what they need to complete for your application.
The recommenders can still fill up their forms and submit up to 7 days after the candidate clicks submit on their application.
Enter the contact information of your recommender below, and then click “Send Invitation”. You may add additional recommenders by selecting the + icon. If you need to edit or remove an individual, use the trash can icon to delete the entry. Please note, once the status is submitted, you will not be able to remove the recommender from your application.

QUESTIONS

1. How do the candidate’s performance, potential, or personal qualities compare to those of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? Please provide specific examples. (textbox, 300 words)

2. Please describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (textbox, 250 words)

INSTRUCTIONS

Two professional recommendation letters are required, providing information about your leadership and management potential. As such, at least one recommendation should come from your workplace; your current supervisor or manager is usually a good choice. The other recommendation should be from someone who has had a chance to evaluate you in a professional setting, for example, a client, a former supervisor or a colleague from your community service or extracurricular activities. Academic recommendations are acceptable but they are less likely to address our main interest, which is to assess your ability to work with and manage others as well as your potential for senior management. If you feel it would add value to your application, you may also upload an optional third letter of recommendation as part of the supporting documents.
It is important to note that your recommenders can submit their online letters to us at their earliest convenience after receiving their links, and no later than 48 hours after the application deadline, to which you are applying.

QUESTIONS

Relationship to Candidate

Please, specify your relationship to candidate: Professional / Educational / Personal

How long have you known the candidate? Define your relationship with the candidate and the circumstances whereby you met. (textbox)

Outstanding (top 2%) Very Good (top 10%) Above Average (top 25%) Average (top 50%) Below Average (bottom 50%) Unobserved

Please give your answers to each of the following questions.

1. Comment on the candidate’s career progress to date and his/her career focus. (textbox, no limit)

2. What do you consider to be the candidate’s major strengths? Comment on the factors that distinguish the candidate from other individuals at his/her level. (textbox, no limit)

3. What do you consider to be the candidate’s major areas for development/improvement? (textbox, no limit)

4. Comment on the candidate’s potential for senior management. Do you see him/her as a future leader? (textbox, no limit)

5. Describe the candidate as a person. Comment on his/her ability to establish and maintain relationships, sensitivity to others, self-confidence, attitude, etc. Specifically comment on the candidate’s behaviour or skills in a group setting/team environment. (textbox, no limit)

INSTRUCTIONS

One letter of recommendation is required, but you may submit up to two for review by the committee. You should seek recommendations from people capable of commenting on your professional, leadership, and intellectual capabilities. The most useful evaluations are from people who are able to speak with certainty about your leadership, maturity, team orientation, analytical skills, and interpersonal skills. Examples include a current supervisor, colleague, client, or former supervisor.

Please provide the contact information for a minimum of one and a maximum of two individuals excited to endorse your candidacy. Official recommendations for Johnson are a vital part of the final evaluation process. Carefully follow the instructions below and note the timing of when the admissions office will review this information.

QUESTIONS

Recommender Information

Thank you for taking the time to write this letter of recommendation on behalf of the applicant. The Admissions Committee greatly appreciates hearing your views.

Please verify your information and provide answers for the additional questions.

Comment on the following topics when constructing the letter of recommendation:

  • Strengths and outstanding qualities
  • How applicant gets along with others
  • Oral and written communication skills
  • English language ability if English is not the applicant’s native language
  • Areas of improvement (weaknesses)
  • Anything else you would like to say about the applicant

Please write on company letterhead if company policy allow and also note that a one page recommendation letter is sufficient. Please upload the letter of recommendation at the bottom of this form.

  • Context of Relationship
  • Current Employer
  • Context of Relationship – Other
  • Nature of Relationship
  • Nature of Relationship – Other
  • How long have you known the applicant?
  • Most Frequent Contact From Date
    dd/mm/yyyy
  • Most Frequent Contact To Date
    dd/mm/yyyy
  • If you are affiliated with the Johnson School or Cornell University, please select the option that most closely matches.
  • Cornell Afilliation – Other
  • If you are a Johnson School graduate, Degree Awarded
  • Johnson Degree Year Awarded
  • If you are a Cornell University graduate, Degree Awarded
  • Cornell Degree Year Awarded
  • May we contact you regarding this applicant?
  • If the applicant receives an offer of admission from Johnson, you may be contacted by a third party company to verify the information you provide. Please let us know how you would prefer to be contacted.
  • Do you use a translator?
  • Name of Translator
  • Translator’s Phone Number (including country code)

Assessment Grid

For each competency, please mark the one button corresponding to the behavior that you have seen the applicant most consistently exhibit. We acknowledge that all applicants have both areas of strength and areas of development. Your candid, honest appraisal will assist in evaluation of the applicant. Please assume that each level builds upon behaviors of the previous level.

Initiative – Acts ahead of need/anticipates problems

  • No basis for judgment
  • Reluctant to take on new tasks; waits to be told what to do; defers to others
  • Willing to step in and take action when required to do so
  • Takes charge spontaneously when problem needs attention
  • Volunteers for new work challenges; proactively puts in extra effort to accomplish critical or difficult tasks
  • Proactively seeks high-impact projects; steps up to challenges even when things are not going well

Results Orientation – Focuses on and drives toward delivering on goals, objectives, and performance improvement

  • No basis for judgment
  • Focuses on fulfilling activities at hand; unsure how work relates to goals
  • Takes actions to overcome obstacles to achieve goals
  • Independently acts to exceed goals and plans for contingencies
  • Documents activities and outcomes to learn from past; introduces incremental improvements to raise the effectiveness of team
  • Invents new approaches with measurably better results; works to deliver best-in-class performance improvements

Communication, Prof Impression & Poise – Delivers messages and ideas in a way that engages an audience and achieves buy-in; uses listening and other attending behaviors to reach shared understanding; remains calm and measured even in time of crisis or conflict

  • No basis for judgment
  • Struggles to get point across; neglects to understand audience’s input or perspective; lacks confidence and gets flustered under pressure
  • Works to get point across; acknowledges feedback; reframes statements when necessary to make them clearer; speaks politely; remains composed in known circumstances
  • Present views clearly and logically structures content for a broad audience; listens and responds to feedback; prepares in advance to appear confident; leaves a positive and professional impression; responds confidently in unfamiliar situations
  • Uses tailored language that appeals to specific groups; restates what others have said to check for understanding; comes across as confident; responds rapidly and strongly to crisis; looked to for advice and guidance
  • Structures content for senior-level meetings; maintains composure when challenged; solicits opinions and concerns, discusses them openly and adjusts communication; when in strong conflict or crisis, remains cool under pressure; channels strong emotion into positive action

Influence and Collaboration – Engages and works with people outside of one’s direct control

  • No basis for judgment
  • Does not seek input and perspective of others
  • Accepts input from others and engages them in problem solving
  • Seeks first to understand perspectives of others; takes actions to gain their support for ideas and initiatives
  • Uses tailored approaches to connect with others, influence, and achieve results
  • Uses tailored influence approaches to create and leverage a network of strategically chosen individuals to improve collective outcomes

Respect For Others – Acknowledges the value of others’ views and actions

  • No basis for judgment
  • Unwilling to acknowledge others’ points of view
  • Open to considering others’ views when confronted or offered
  • Invites input from others because of expressed respect for them and their views
  • Praises people publicly for their good actions; ensures that others’ opinions are heard before their own
  • Uses empathy and personal experience to resolve conflicts and foster mutual respect; reinforces respect with public praise when individuals solicit and use input from others

Team Leadership – Manages and empowers a team of direct reports or peers on project based teams (includes virtual teams)

  • No basis for judgment
  • Struggles to delegate effectively (e.g. micromanages); does not organize activities or provide appropriate information to complete tasks
  • Assigns tasks and tells people what to do; checks when they are done
  • Solicits ideas and perspectives from the team; structures activities; holds members accountable
  • Actively engages the team to develop plans and resolve issues through collaboration; shows the impact of individual/team contributions
  • Recruits others into duties or roles based on insight into individual abilities; rewards those who exceed expectations; provides strong organizational support

Developing Others – Helps people develop their performance and ability over time

  • No basis for judgment
  • Focuses only on one’s own growth; critical of others’ efforts to develop
  • Encourages people to develop; points out mistakes to help people develop and praises them for improvements
  • Gives specific positive and negative behavioral feedback to support the development of others
  • Provides overarching practical guiding principles and recommendations that are applicable in multiple situations to direct or focus efforts on specific areas of development
  • Identifies potential in others; inspires others to develop by providing feedback, mentoring/coaching, and identifying new growth opportunities as well as supporting their effort to change

Trustworthiness/Integrity – Acts consistently in line with or follows explicit values, beliefs or intentions

  • No basis for judgment
  • Follows the crowd; takes path of least resistance; gives in under pressure
  • Acts consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs when it is easy to do so
  • Acts spontaneously and consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs despite opposition
  • Initiates actions based on values or beliefs even though the actions may come with reputational risk; demonstrates the values of the team or organization publicly
  • Demonstrates high personal integrity even at personal cost; holds people accountable to the team or organizational values

Adaptability/Resilience – Adapts to changing demands and circumstances without difficulty. Maintains calm optimism in the face of challenge, problems, or apparent failure

  • No basis for judgment
  • Prefers existing ways of doing things; fears failure; becomes anxious under challenging situations
  • Adapts to new methods and procedures when required to do so; remains calm in unfamiliar situations until confronted with obstacle
  • Champions adoption of new initiatives and processes; exhibits level-headedness in most environments including challenging ones; persists until obstacle is overcome
  • Seeks out disruptions as an opportunity for improvement; remains optimistic and forward-looking in difficult situations that may result in failure
  • Energized by projects with high uncertainty but potential for high reward; seeks to be the first into unknown or unfamiliar situations; welcomes learning opportunities created by failure; learns from mistakes and rebounds quickly from setbacks

Self Awareness – Aware of and seeks out additional input on own strengths and weaknesses

  • No basis for judgment
  • Lacks awareness of how he/she is perceived; denies or offers excuses when confronted
  • Acknowledges fault or performance problem when confronted with concrete example or data
  • Describes own key strengths and weaknesses accurately; welcomes feedback from others and discusses opportunities to change with select individuals
  • Actively seeks out feedback to explicitly address desired improvement areas or build on strengths; explores reasons for problems openly, including own faults
  • Seeks out challenging and potentially risky experiences to improve; identifies and engages with resources—people, processes, or content—to maximize strengths or mitigate weaknesses

Problem Solving – Frames problems, analyzes situations, identifies key issues, conducts analysis on the issues, and produces acceptable solution

  • No basis for judgment
  • Avoids problems; when faced with problems, sticks to what worked before, or chooses an obvious path
  • Offers solutions when the risk is low; focuses on immediate, short-term implications instead of the big picture
  • Looks beyond the obvious; identifies and focuses on the critical information needed to understand a problem, identifies root cause(s), and comes up with reasonable solutions
  • Gathers and analyzes key information using complex methods or several layers deep; integrates perspectives from a variety of sources to arrive at unexpected but practical and effective solutions
  • Applies logic to break complex problems down into manageable parts or sub-problems; solves tough and interconnected problems and can explain how the pieces are connected

Strategic Orientation – Thinks beyond one’s span of control and into the future to reshape the approach or scope of work

  • No basis for judgment
  • Focuses on completing work without understanding implications
  • Understands immediate issues or implications of work or analysis
  • Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have improved near-term business performance
  • Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have shaped team/organization strategy and will have impact on long-term business performance
  • Develops insights or recommendations beyond area of responsibility with impact on long-term business strategy and performance

(Optional) Comments

Please share any additional thoughts about the candidate and/or clarify your ratings below. Is there anything about your ratings on which you would like to comment? (textbox)

Recommendation Questions

You may answer all of these questions by uploading a letter of recommendation.

1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization. (textbox, Recommended word count: 50 words)

2. How does the applicant’s performance compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? Please provide specific examples. (E.g. what are the applicant’s principal strengths?) (textbox, Recommended word count: 500 words)

3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (textbox, Recommended word count: 500 words)

4. (Optional) Is there anything else we should know? (textbox)

Please upload recommendation letter (upload file)

Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this applicant compared to her/his peer group? (select)

Overall, I (select)

INSTRUCTIONS

You’ll need one reference from a supervisor. We cannot accept an academic reference or a reference from a relative.
Decide who you would like them to be and ask them now. Applications are often held up because of references failing to be submitted. An automated reference request will be sent to your referee once you have entered their contact details into our online application system.
You are required to provide one reference. This reference should come from a line manager or a supervisor.
You are required to submit a reference from a supervisor. If you are an entrepreneur, own your own business or work for a family business, you can select a supplier or client.
Please note that reference should come from a valid work email address. We cannot accept reference submitted from a personal email address.
Reference must be received by the deadline for applicants to be considered in that round. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure their referee is aware of the relevant deadline.
Please note that all references should come from a valid work email address. We cannot accept references submitted from a personal email address.
References must be received by the final application deadline for applicants to be considered. It is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure their referee is aware of the relevant deadline.

QUESTIONS

Rate the applicant

Please use the table below to appraise the applicant in the context of her or his peer group.

  • What is the peer group that you are using? _______________
  • Number in peer group ______________
  • Applicant’s ranking within peer group ________________

(for each of the following, select from drop down: below average ; average ; good ; outstanding ; exceptional)

  • Integrity
  • Ability to work with others
  • Creativity
  • Motivation
  • Self-confidence
  • Analytical skills
  • Written communication skills
  • Oral communication skills
  • Leadership potential
  • Responsibility for own action
  • Quantitative numerical skill

Reference letter

Please provide us with a one-two page letter of reference for the candidate.
Please include the following in your reference letter:

  1. Date
  2. Your job title
  3. Your organisation
  4. Your name
  5. Your signature (can be electronic/typed/scanned)

Please tell us anything that you think will help the Admissions Committee evaluate the candidate’s application, but in particular we would like you to address the following issues:

Reference criteria

The applicant has identified you as the following reference type: Supervisor

Please complete the following if you are a Supervisor or Peer Referee

1. Elaborate and / or provide us with concrete examples if you have rated the applicant as below average, outstanding or exceptional on any of the qualities in the ‘Rate the Applicant’ Section.

2. Describe what you like most and least about working with the applicant.

3. Tell us about any particular weakness the candidate has compared to other peers / team members that you regularly work with.

4. Describe the applicant’s attitude and behaviour when working with: (a) managers/supervisors (b) peers (c) subordinates.

5. Suggest what you think the applicant will be doing in ten years.

Please complete the following if you are an Academic Referee

1. Elaborate and/or provide us with concrete examples of how the applicant has demonstrated the intellectual capacity to undertake this postgraduate programme. For example, demonstration of quant skill, capability of rigorous analysis & critical reflection of problems, mastering understanding in theoretical concepts.

2. Please provide us with any further relevant information about the candidate’s experience, abilities and temperament that you feel would be relevant.

3. Please indicate where the applicant was ranked in the class.

(upload file)

INSTRUCTIONS

Full-Time MBA Applicants: Please submit two recommendations from individuals who can objectively assess and speak directly about your professional experience and leadership promise.
You’ll need to submit two letters of recommendation for your application to be considered complete. Ideally, one letter should come from a current supervisor or manager. The second should come from someone who can evaluate your professional performance and your managerial/leadership potential (e.g., former supervisor, previous employer, client).

MBAi Applicants Only: Please ensure that at least one of your recommendations specifically addresses your technical aptitude and/or professional accomplishments at the intersection of business and technology.

Kellogg Future Leaders Program:

New applicants: Please submit one and only one recommendation from an individual who can objectively assess and speak directly about your performance and leadership potential. This can be from a former or current supervisor, school or extracurricular administrator, or faculty member who knows you well.
Matriculating students: Please submit one and only one professional recommendation. Ideally, this recommendation will be from a current supervisor; if this is not possible, please provide another recommender who can speak to your professional experience and performance.
*Please note: Recommendations are a required part of the Kellogg application and will not be considered complete until received. All recommendations must also be received by the application deadline.

QUESTIONS

Recommender Information

  • Context of Relationship (select)
  • I am the applicant’s current supervisor (check)
  • Highest Degree Earned: (select)
  • Degree Granting Institution ___________
  • Are you a Kellogg Alumnus? (select)
  • Have known candidate since: (select)
  • Please comment briefly on the context of your interaction with the applicant and his/her role in your organization. (textbox, 250 characters)
  • What has been the candidate’s most significant contribution to your organization? Provide measurable impact if applicable. (textbox, 250 characters)

Leadership Assessment

Listed below you will find a section listing some competencies and character traits that contribute to successful leadership. For each item, please select the response corresponding to the behavior that the candidate most typically exhibits. Your candid, honest appraisal of the candidate will be helpful to the Admissions Committee.

Please assess the candidate on the following skills/qualities. (for each – select from dropdown)

  • Results Orientation
  • Strategic Orientation
  • Team Leadership
  • Influence and Collaboration
  • Communicating
  • Information Seeking
  • Developing Others
  • Change Leadership
  • Respect for Others
  • Trustworthiness

Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this candidate compared to her/his peer group? (select)

If needed, please explain any rankings above. (textbox, 250 characters)

Do you recommend this candidate for Kellogg? (select)

Are you willing to speak with an admissions officer about this candidate? (select)

Should the candidate accept an offer of admission, I understand I may be contacted by Re Vera Services as part of the application verification process, via phone and/or email, to verify authenticity of this letter of recommendation. (please type your full legal name) ________________

Recommendation Letter

Please address all of the following questions:

1. Kellogg has a diverse student body and values students who are inclusive and encouraging of others with differing perspectives and backgrounds. Please tell us about a time when you witnessed the candidate living these values. (300 words)

2. How does the candidate’s performance compare to those of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? Please provide specific examples. (300 words)

3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the candidate. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (250 words)

4. (Optional) Is there anything else you would like us to know?

Upload a Word or PDF document, Or, type or copy-and-paste your document here: (textbox)

INSTRUCTIONS

One reference is required in order to complete your application. Our preference is that you choose a current employer, or a colleague if you do not want to use your line manager at this time, a
former employer, a long-standing client, or someone else who knows you well in a work context. You should only select someone who taught you at university if you have remained in close contact.
Whoever you choose should know you in a professional capacity.
You need to ask someone to act as your referee, this person could be either of the following:
your current employer (if you don’t want to ask your employer to be a referee, a colleague is acceptable)
someone else who knows you well in a work context, for example a former employer or long-standing client.
After you input your referee’s details into the online application form we will send them an email with log-in details for our online reference system. London Business School reserves the right to contact your referee for further information in connection with your application.

QUESTIONS

Comments

Please answer the following questions regarding the applicant, making sure to save your work regularly.
As a guideline for completing the reference form you should aim to write no more than 500 words per question. Please note that 500 words is the maximum amount and not a requirement.

1. How do you know the applicant? How long have you known them for? (textbox)

2. What would you say are the applicant’s key strengths and talents? (textbox)

3. What would you say are the applicant’s key weaknesses or areas for improvement? (textbox)

4. How do the applicant’s performance, potential and personal qualities compare to those of other individuals in similar roles? (textbox)

5. What do you think this person might be doing in ten years’ time? Why? (textbox)

Ratings

Please rate the applicant, comparing them with other members of his or her peer group, on the qualities listed below using the following scoring system:

1 = High 3 = Average 5 = Low

  • Intellectual or academic ability 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
  • Quantitative skills 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
  • Initiative / ability to take decisions 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
  • Problem-solving skills 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
  • Organisational skills 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
  • Leadership skills 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
  • Team skills 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
  • Impact / charisma 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
  • Self confidence 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
  • Self motivation 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
  • Spoken English communication skills 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed
  • Written English communication skills 1 (High) 2 3 4 5 (Low) Not observed

Please indicate your overall recommendation on a five point score from (1) Highly Recommended to (5) Not Recommended

  • Recommendation 1 2 3 4 5

Please feel free to elaborate on your recommendation. (textbox) (Note: If you prefer to submit additional comments in a separate letter, please email this to [email protected])

We require one recommendation from a person who has supervised your work and/or assessed your performance. The Admissions Committee limits each application to one letter of recommendation and cannot accept additional recommendations.

While completing your application, you will be able to send your recommender an invitation to submit their recommendation. Professional recommendations are strongly recommended (i.e. direct supervisor, indirect supervisor, or a client). If you are unable to request a letter of recommendation from your direct supervisor or feel that another recommender would be more appropriate, please explain why in your optional essay statement.  Once your letter of recommendation is received, you will receive an automated email.

While completing the recommendation form, your recommender will be asked to assess specific competencies and traits, and they will also be asked to answer the following three questions:

  1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organizations. (50 words)
  2. How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? For example, what are the applicant’s principal strengths? (Recommended word count: 250 words)
  3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (Recommended word count: 250 words)

Your recommender will also have the option to upload a response to the optional question: “Is there anything else we should know?”

Tip: Give your recommender plenty of time to submit their recommendation by sending them an invitation via the application. Once you start your application, you can always save your progress.

INSTRUCTIONS

Michigan Ross uses the GMAC Common Recommendation Form, and we require only one recommendation. Select a recommender who can discuss your professional performance and work style; a current or former supervisor is ideal. Alternatives include a client, project manager, or professional mentor. Your recommender should be able to answer the following questions:
List one recommender who will complete a reference form in support of your application. Once you click the “Submit Recommendation Request” button below, your recommender will receive an email from ApplyWeb with instructions.
If you are not selecting a direct supervisor as your recommender, please address why in the optional essay.
Please note that a member of the admissions committee or third party vendor may reach out to your recommender to verify their recommendation.
To send the recommendation request email, please click the ‘Submit Recommendation Request’ button below.

QUESTIONS

  1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization. (50 words)
  2. How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? (E.g., what are the applicant’s principal strengths?) (500 words)
  3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (500 words)

INSTRUCTIONS

You must provide a minimum of two references using the referee’s professional or institutional email address. References from personal email addresses will not be accepted (@gmail, @yahoo, @hotmail etc.)
We require two professional or academic references. Using the online application form you will need to submit two references, preferably from professional referees. Once your referee details are input into the form, your referee will receive an automatic email from the School with details on how to complete the online reference form. Please note we can only accept references from a valid work/professional/institutional email address and not from Gmail/Hotmail accounts.

QUESTIONS

Applicant Information

For each of the skills below, mark in table: Needs Improvement ; Developing ; Competent ; Exceeds Expectations ; Unknown/Not Observed

  • Intellectual Curiosity
  • Leadership skills
  • Ability to work in a team
  • Energy and drive
  • English language ability

Please upload a letter below, to elaborate on your ratings you have given the candidate above. Please also indicate, for how long you have known the candidate and in what capacity, what are their strengths and weaknesses, and how you think the candidate would benefit from the programme. (upload file)

Two Letters of Reference are required. Reference letters must be from people who know you well, and can comment knowledgeably about your professional and/or academic background, and can provide a detailed evaluation of your qualifications for our MBA. The online application reference letters’ automatic tool should be used providing your referee’s company email address.

  • How long have you known the candidate? In what connection? (textbox)
  • In your mind, what are the candidate’s most revealing qualities? (textbox)
  • What are the candidate’s most significant weaknesses? (textbox)
  • Do you consider the candidate suitable for admission to a challenging full-time program such as the Master of Business Administration – MBA? (textbox)

Please rate this candidate regarding the following traits: (for each trait, select: Excellent ; Above average ; Average ; Below average)

  • Group skills
  • Discussion skills
  • Commitment to goals
  • Ability to lead
  • Potential to grow

Please comment further on your judgement and add other information you think may be useful: (textbox)

Do you know of any purely emotional factors to be kept in mind regarding the candidate’s effective participation to the Master of Business Administration – MBA? If so, could you give some instances: (textbox)

Instructions

A detailed recommendation can tell us a lot about you. Make sure you select an individual qualified to speak about your results as a professional and your potential as a leader.

Some important details:
MBA applicants must submit one letter of recommendation.
A recommendation from a professional contact is preferred, ideally a manager or supervisor.
We do not accept recommendations from family members.
MIT Sloan utilizes the GMAC Common Letter of Recommendation form.
Find more information about the GMAC Common Letter of Recommendation here.
Your letter of recommender must be received by the deadline date. It is your responsibility to remind your recommender to make sure it is submitted on time.

Additional References

We want to make sure we give you the best chance to show us your strengths. If we still have questions after reading your application, we might reach out to your additional references. Similar to your recommender, these additional reference contacts should be able to speak to your professional and/or academic background.

Some important details:
All MBA Applicants must provide contact information for two additional references.
References should be different from your recommender.
Please enter the names and contact information (phone and email) for each additional reference as well as where they work and their relationship to you.
If the admissions committee wishes to contact any of your references, we will reach out directly to the reference to set up a mutually convenient time to talk.

QUESTIONS

Recommender Information

  • Context of Relationship (select)
  • Nature of relationship (select)
  • How long have you known the applicant? (select)
  • During which period of time have you had the most frequent contact with the applicant? From: To:
  • If you are affiliated with MIT Sloan or the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, please select the option that most closely matches. (select)
  • May we contact you regarding this applicant? (select)
  • Occasionally candidates would like to be considered for other MIT programs or partner schools and ask us to share their applications with these programs. Please indicate below if you would like us to share your recommendation.
    • I authorize MIT Sloan to share my recommendation. (check)
  • Did you use a translator? (select)

Section 2

In this section, you will find 16 competencies and character traits that contribute to successful leadership. The competencies and character traits are grouped into five categories:

– Achievement
– Influence
– People
– Personal Qualities
– Cognitive Abilities

For each competency, please select the one button that corresponds to the behavior that you have seen the applicant most consistently exhibit. We acknowledge that all applicants have both areas of strength and areas of development. Your candid and honest appraisal will assist in evaluation of the applicant. Please assume that each level builds upon behaviors of the previous level.

Achievement

1. Initiative: Acts ahead of need/anticipates problems

6. No basis for judgment
5. Reluctant to take on new tasks; waits to be told what to do; defers to others
4. Willing to step in and take charge when required to do so
3. Takes charge spontaneously when problem needs attention
2. Volunteers for new work challenges; proactively puts in extra effort to accomplish critical or difficult tasks
1. Proactively seeks high-impact projects; steps up to challenges even when things are not going well

2. Results Orientation: Focuses on and drives toward delivering on goals, objectives, and performance improvement

6. No basis for judgment
5. Focuses on fulfilling activities at hand; unsure how work relates to goals
4. Takes actions to overcome obstacles to achieve goals
3. Independently acts to exceed goals and plans for contingencies
2. Documents activities and outcomes to learn from past; introduces incremental improvements to raise the effectiveness of team
1. Invents new approaches with measurably better results; works to deliver best-in-class performance improvements

Influence

3. Communication, Professional Impression & Poise: Delivers messages and ideas in a way that engages an audience and achieves buy-in; uses listening and other attending behaviors to reach shared understanding; remains calm and measured even in time of crisis or conflict

6. No basis for judgment
5. Struggles to get point across; neglects to understand audience’s input or perspective; lacks confidence and gets flustered under pressure
4. Works to get point across; acknowledges feedback; reframes statements when necessary to make them clearer; speaks politely; remains composed in known circumstances
3. Present views clearly and logically structures content for a broad audience; listens and responds to feedback; prepares in advance to appear confident; leaves a positive and professional impression; responds confidently in unfamiliar situations
2. Uses tailored language that appeals to specific groups; restates what others have said to check for understanding; comes across as confident; responds rapidly and strongly to crisis; looked to for advice and guidance
1. Structures content for senior-level meetings; maintains composure when challenged; solicits opinions and concerns, discusses them openly and adjusts communication; remains cool under pressure during conflict or crisis; channels emotion into positive action

4. Influence and Collaboration: Engages and works with people over whom one has no direct control

6. No basis for judgment
5. Does not seek input and perspective of others
4. Accepts input from others and engages them in problem solving
3. Seeks first to understand perspectives of others; takes actions to gain their support for ideas and initiatives
2. Uses tailored approaches to connect with others, influence, and achieve results
1. Uses tailored influence approaches to create and leverage a network of strategically chosen individuals to improve collective outcomes

People

5. Respect for Others: Acknowledges the value of others’ views and actions

6. No basis for judgment
5. Unwilling to acknowledge others’ points of view
4. Open to considering others’ views when confronted or offered
3. Invites input from others because of expressed respect for them and their views
2. Praises people publicly for their good actions; ensures that others’ opinions are heard before their own
1. Uses empathy and personal experience to resolve conflicts and foster mutual respect; reinforces respect with public praise when individuals solicit and use input from others

6. Team Leadership: Manages and empowers a team of formal or informal direct reports, including virtual teams

6. No basis for judgment
5. Struggles to delegate effectively (e.g. micromanages); does not organize activities or provide appropriate information to complete tasks
4. Assigns tasks and tells people what to do; checks when they are done
3. Solicits ideas and perspectives from the team; structures activities; holds members accountable
2. Actively engages the team to develop plans and resolve issues through collaboration; shows the impact of individual/team contributions
1. Recruits others into duties or roles based on insight into individual abilities; rewards those who exceed expectations; provides strong organizational support

7. Developing Others: Helps people develop their performance and ability over time

6. No basis for judgment
5. Focuses only on one’s own growth; critical of others’ efforts to develop
4. Encourages people to develop; points out mistakes to help people develop and praises them for improvements
3. Gives specific positive and negative behavioral feedback to support the development of others
2. Provides overarching practical guiding principles and recommendations that are applicable in multiple situations to direct or focus efforts on specific areas of development
1. Identifies potential in others; inspires others to develop by providing feedback, mentoring/coaching, and identifying new growth opportunities as well as supporting their effort to change

Personal Qualities

8. Trustworthiness/ Integrity: Acts consistently in line with or follows explicit values, beliefs or intentions

6. No basis for judgment
5. Follows the crowd; takes path of least resistance; gives in under pressure
4. Acts consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs when it is easy to do so
3. Acts spontaneously and consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs despite opposition
2. Initiates actions based on values or beliefs even though the actions may come with reputational risk; demonstrates the values of the team or organization publicly
1. Demonstrates high personal integrity even at personal cost; holds people accountable to the team or organizational values

9. Adaptability/ Resilience: Adapts to changing demands and circumstances without difficulty. Maintains calm optimism in the face of challenge, problems, or apparent failure

6. No basis for judgment
5. Prefers existing ways of doing things; fears failure; becomes anxious under challenging situations
4. Adapts to new methods and procedures when required to do so; remains calm in unfamiliar situations until confronted with obstacle
3. Champions adoption of new initiatives and processes; exhibits level-headedness in most environments including challenging ones; persists until obstacle is overcome
2. Seeks out disruptions as an opportunity for improvement; remains optimistic and forward-looking in difficult situations that may result in failure
1. Energized by projects with high uncertainty but potential for high reward; seeks to be the first into unknown or unfamiliar situations; welcomes learning opportunities created by failure; learns from mistakes and rebounds quickly from setbacks

10. Self Awareness: Aware of and seeks out additional input on own strengths and weaknesses

6. No basis for judgment
5. Lacks awareness of how he/she is perceived; denies or offers excuses when confronted
4. Acknowledges fault or performance problem when confronted with concrete example or data
3. Describes own key strengths and weaknesses accurately; welcomes feedback from others and discusses opportunities to change with select individuals
2. Actively seeks out feedback to explicitly address desired improvement areas or build on strengths; explores reasons for problems openly, including own faults
1. Seeks out challenging and potentially risky experiences to improve; identifies and engages with resources—people, processes, or content—to maximize strengths or mitigate weaknesses

Cognitive

11. Problem Solving: Frames problems, analyzes situations, identifies key issues, conducts analysis on the issues, and produces acceptable solution

6. No basis for judgment
5. Avoids problems; when faced with problems, sticks to what worked before, or chooses an obvious path
4. Offers solutions when the risk is low; focuses on immediate, short-term implications instead of the big picture
3. Looks beyond the obvious; identifies and focuses on the critical information needed to understand a problem, identifies root cause(s), and comes up with reasonable solutions
2. Gathers and analyzes key information using complex methods or several layers deep; integrates perspectives from a variety of sources to arrive at unexpected but practical and effective solutions
1. Applies logic to break complex problems down into manageable parts or sub-problems; solves tough and interconnected problems and can explain how the pieces are connected

12. Strategic Orientation: Thinks beyond one’s span of control and into the future to reshape the approach or scope of work

6. No basis for judgment
5. Focuses on completing work without understanding implications
4. Understands immediate issues or implications of work or analysis
3. Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have improved near-term business performance
2. Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have shaped team/organization strategy and will have impact on long-term business performance
1. Develops insights or recommendations beyond area of responsibility with impact on long-term business strategy and performance

(Optional) Is there anything about your competency ratings on which you’d like to comment? (textbox)

Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this candidate compared to her/his peer group? (select)

Overall, I … (select)

Section 3

Please answer the following questions and provide specific examples where possible.

1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization. (textbox, Recommended word count: 50 words)

2. How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? (E.g. what are the applicant’s principal strengths?) (textbox, Recommended word count: 500 words)

3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (textbox, Recommended word count: 500 words)

4. (Optional) Is there anything else we should know?
Upload file, Or, type or copy-and-paste your document here: (textbox)

INSTRUCTIONS

This is your chance to let someone else tell us how great you are! Please solicit two online letters of reference for your MBA application.
One reference from your current direct supervisor (or next best alternative) at work
One reference from someone else who has supervised your work
Notify your recommenders which type of letter of reference they will be completing for you (Current Direct Supervisor or Other) and in which round you will be applying.

Your recommenders are required to submit their letters through the online application by the deadline of the round in which you apply — and you are responsible for ensuring that the letters are submitted on time. We strongly encourage you to notify your recommenders well in advance. You’ll feel better knowing that they have been submitted, and your recommenders will be less likely to encounter difficulties due to high server traffic on the application deadline date.

QUESTIONS

Recommender Information

  • How long have you known the applicant?
  • During which period of time have you had the most frequent contact with the applicant?
  • You have been registered by the applicant as providing this type of Letter of Reference. Please do not change this without consulting with the applicant.
  • Are/were you the applicant’s direct supervisor?
  • Please comment briefly on the context of your interaction with the applicant. If applicable, describe the applicant’s role in your organization.(Limit 320 characters.)
  • Did you use a translator?
  • If you are a Stanford GSB alumna/alumnus, please enter your degree class year
  • How many candidates are you recommending to Stanford GSB this year?

Leadership Assessment

Listed below you will find a number of competencies that contribute to successful leadership. Within each category, please mark the one button corresponding to the behavior that the candidate most typically exhibits. We acknowledge that all candidates have both areas of strength and areas of development. If you select the highest rating, please provide specific examples in your letter.

Initiative 

  • No basis for judgment
  • Reluctant to take on new tasks; waits to be told what to do; defers to others
  • Willing to step in and take charge when required to do so
  • Takes charge spontaneously when problem needs attention
  • Volunteers for new work challenges; proactively puts in extra effort to accomplish critical or difficult tasks
  • Proactively seeks high-impact projects; steps up to challenges even when things are not going well

Results Orientation 

  • No basis for judgment
  • Focuses on fulfilling activities at hand; unsure how work relates to goals
  • Takes actions to overcome obstacles to achieve goals
  • Independently acts to exceed goals and plans for contingencies
  • Documents activities and outcomes to learn from past; introduces incremental improvements to raise the effectiveness of team
  • Invents new approaches with measurably better results; works to deliver best-in-class performance improvements

Communication, Professional Impression & Poise 

  • No basis for judgment
  • Struggles to get point across; neglects to understand audience’s input or perspective; lacks confidence and gets flustered under pressure
  • Works to get point across; acknowledges feedback; reframes statements when necessary to make them clearer; speaks politely; remains composed in known circumstances
  • Presents views clearly and logically structures content for a broad audience; listens and responds to feedback; prepares in advance to appear confident; leaves a positive and professional impression; responds confidently in unfamiliar situations
  • Uses tailored language that appeals to specific groups; restates what others have said to check for understanding; comes across as confident; responds rapidly and strongly to crisis; looked to for advice and guidance
  • Maintains composure when challenged; solicits opinions and concerns, discusses them openly and adjusts communication; when in strong conflict or crisis, remains cool under pressure; channels strong emotion into positive action

Influence and Collaboration 

  • No basis for judgment
  • Does not seek input and perspective of others
  • Accepts input from others and engages them in problem solving
  • Seeks first to understand perspectives of others; takes actions to gain their support for ideas and initiatives
  • Uses tailored approaches to connect with others, influence, and achieve results
  • Uses tailored influence approaches to create and leverage a network of strategically chosen individuals to improve collective outcomes

Respect for Others

  • No basis for judgment
  • Unwilling to acknowledge others’ points of view
  • Open to considering others’ views when confronted or offered
  • Invites input from others because of expressed respect for them and their views
  • Praises people publicly for their good actions; ensures that others’ opinions are heard before their own
  • Uses empathy and personal experience to resolve conflicts and foster mutual respect; reinforces respect with public praise when individuals solicit and use input from others

Team Leadership

  • No basis for judgment
  • Struggles to delegate effectively (e.g. micromanages); does not organize activities or provide appropriate information to complete tasks
  • Assigns tasks and tells people what to do; checks when they are done
  • Solicits ideas and perspectives from the team; structures activities; holds members accountable
  • Actively engages the team to develop plans and resolve issues through collaboration; shows the impact of individual/team contributions
  • Recruits others into duties or roles based on insight into individual abilities; rewards those who exceed expectations; provides strong organizational support

Developing Others

  • No basis for judgment
  • Focuses only on own growth; critical of others’ efforts to develop
  • Encourages people to develop; points out mistakes to help people develop and praises them for improvements
  • Gives specific positive and negative behavioral feedback to support the development of others
  • Provides overarching practical guiding principles and recommendations that are applicable in multiple situations to direct or focus efforts on specific areas of development
  • Identifies potential in others; inspires others to develop by providing feedback, mentoring/coaching, and identifying new growth opportunities as well as supporting their effort to change

Trustworthiness/ Integrity 

  • No basis for judgment
  • Follows the crowd; takes path of least resistance; gives in under pressure
  • Acts consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs when it is easy to do so
  • Acts spontaneously and consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs despite opposition
  • Initiates actions based on values or beliefs even though the actions may come with reputational risk; demonstrates the values of the team or organization publicly
  • Demonstrates high personal integrity even at personal cost; holds people accountable to the team or organizational values

Adaptability/Resilience 

  • No basis for judgment
  • Prefers existing ways of doing things; fears failure; becomes anxious under challenging situations
  • Adapts to new methods and procedures when required to do so; remains calm in unfamiliar situations until confronted with obstacle
  • Champions adoption of new initiatives and processes; exhibits calm in unfamiliar situations until confronted with obstacle
  • Seeks out disruptions as an opportunity for improvement; remains optimistic and forward-looking in difficult situations that may result in failure
  • Energized by projects with high uncertainty but potential for high reward; seeks to be the first into unknown or unfamiliar situations; welcomes learning opportunities created by failure; learns from mistakes and rebounds quickly from setbacks

Self Awareness 

  • No basis for judgment
  • Lacks awareness of how he/she is perceived; denies or offers excuses when confronted
  • Acknowledges fault or performance problem when confronted with concrete example or data
  • Describes own key strengths and weaknesses accurately; welcomes feedback from others and discusses opportunities to change with select individuals
  • Actively seeks out feedback to explicitly address desired improvement areas or build on strengths; explores reasons for problems openly, including own faults
  • Seeks out challenging and potentially risky experiences to improve; identifies and engages with resources – people, processes, or content – to maximize strengths or mitigate weaknesses

Problem Solving

  • No basis for judgment
  • Avoids problems; when faced with problems, sticks to what worked before, or chooses an obvious path
  • Offers solutions when the risk is low; focuses on immediate, short-term implications instead of the big picture
  • Looks beyond the obvious; identifies and focuses on the critical information needed to understand a problem, identifies root cause(s), and comes up with reasonable solutions
  • Gathers and analyzes key information using complex methods or several layers deep; integrates perspectives from a variety of sources to arrive at unexpected but practical and effective solutions
  • Applies logic to break complex problems down into manageable parts or sub-problems; solves tough and interconnected problems and can explain how the pieces are connected

Strategic Orientation 

  • No basis for judgment
  • Focuses on completing work without understanding implications
  • Understands immediate issues or implications of work or analysis
  • Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have improved near-term business performance
  • Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have shaped team/organization strategy and will have impact on long-term business performance
  • Develops insights or recommendations beyond area of responsibility with impact on long-term business strategy and performance

Please feel free to comment if you need to clarify the ratings you have assigned. (textbox)

Based on your professional experience, how would you rate this candidate compared to her/his peer group? (select)

Overall, I (select)

Reference Questions

The most useful recommendations provide detailed descriptions, candid anecdotes, and specific evidence that highlight the candidate’s behavior, actions and impact on those around her or him. This kind of information helps distinguish the very best individuals from a pool of many well-qualified candidates. Please write your answers to the following questions in a separate document and upload that document into the online application.

Questions:

  1. How does the applicant’s performance compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? Please provide specific examples. (E.g., what are the applicant’s principal strengths?) – Up to 500 words
  2. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. – Up to 500 words
  3. (Optional) Is there anything else we should know?

Please do not include graphics or icons such as company letterhead.

Save your recommendation form before uploading your document by clicking on the Save button below. To upload your document:

  • Click on the Choose File or Browse button
  • Locate your document and click on Open in the pop-up window
  • Click on the Save button

Once you have uploaded your letter, a “View uploaded document” link will appear below to the right. You can ignore the “No file chosen” or “No file selected” message if the View link is there.

(Upload letter)

INSTRUCTIONS

You are required to submit two EQ Endorsements. EQ Endorsements should come from individuals who can objectively assess your potential for success in NYU Stern’s MBA program and in your future career, and who can act as a persuasive advocate of your EQ strengths. View details on the EQ Endorsement.
The EQ Endorsements should be completed online. Please provide the names and contact information of endorsers below.
Once you have added your endorser information below, an email will be sent to him/her with instructions on how to proceed with the online endorsement. If you would like to send a reminder email, click the endorser’s name below and then click the “Send Reminder” button at the bottom of the box to automatically generate a reminder email.
Make sure to have your endorser whitelist the stern.nyu.edu domain to ensure receipt of our notification. If your endorser is having difficulty accessing your endorsement using his or her company email address, have your endorser provide you with his/her personal email address. Then use that personal email address to create and send a new endorsement request from the application.
For those endorsers who wish to submit their endorsement on paper or who require a translation, you must contact NYU Stern MBA Admissions via email at [email protected] for prior approval.

Choosing Your Endorsers
One EQ Endorsement must come from your current supervisor. If you cannot include an endorsement from your current supervisor, you must provide an explanation in the online application.
The second EQ Endorsement may come from someone who knows you professionally and/or personally.
EQ Endorsements should come from individuals who can objectively assess your potential for success in NYU Stern’s MBA program and in your future career, and who can act as a persuasive advocate of your EQ strengths.
Immediate family members should not write your EQ endorsement.
Submitting more than two EQ endorsements is not encouraged but is allowed. Please carefully consider whether additional endorsements add significant value and a new and unique perspective to your application.

EQ endorsements must be submitted online.
If your endorser cannot submit an online endorsement, you must email [email protected] to explain the circumstances and request approval for your endorser to submit a paper endorsement.
If your endorser cannot complete an endorsement in English, they will need to follow the instructions above and have the endorsement translated into English through a certified English translation service. Upon submitting the endorsement, your endorser must include the original letter and the translated copy. Applications which only include the translated copy may be made incomplete. Endorsers can upload these documents directly to the application as a single pdf via the link provided, or they may email the original endorsement and translated copy to [email protected] to be added to the application. Endorsements can only be accepted directly from the endorser.

QUESTIONS

EQ Endorsement

Please rate the applicant in relation to his or her peers. (for each skill below, select from drop-down menu: outstanding / excellent / good / average / below average / unable to judge)

  • Analytical/Quantitative Ability:
  • Oral Communication Skills:
  • Written Communication Skills:
  • Initiative:
  • Integrity:
  • Leadership:
  • Maturity:
  • Teamwork:
  • Professionalism:
  • Emotional Intelligence (EQ):

Please mark your overall recommendation regarding this applicant’s admission to NYU Stern: (select)

1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization. (textbox, no limit)

2. How does the applicant’s performance compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles (if applicable)? Please provide specific examples. (E.g. what are the applicant’s principal strengths?) (textbox, no limit)

3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (textbox, no limit)

4. IQ+EQ is a core value of NYU Stern, and we seek exceptional individuals who possess both intellectual and interpersonal strengths. Emotional intelligence (EQ) skills such as self-awareness, empathy, communication and self-management are at the core of our community of leaders.
Please provide one specific and compelling example to demonstrate the applicant’s emotional intelligence. (textbox, no limit)

5. (Optional) Is there anything else we should know? (textbox, no limit)

(Upload document)

I confirm that I am the EQ Endorser identified above, that I have written this endorsement in its entirety and that the applicant did not draft, write, influence, coerce, or submit this document.

INSTRUCTIONS

We require just one recommendation and prefer that you select someone from your professional life. Ideally you would pick a supervisor (current or previous) but someone who can speak to your strengths at work would be best.
Here’s how this works – enter the name and contact information for your recommender below and we will email him/her with instructions for completing the recommendation online. We will reach out to your recommender as soon as you complete this section and click on “Send to Recommender.” We will ask that they fill it out quickly so that your application can be processed.
After you submit your application, check back to see the status of your recommendation and, if needed, nudge your recommender to ensure they submit quickly. We don’t want anything to hold up your application!
We use the GMAC Common Letter of Recommendation (LOR). The Common LOR is intended to save you and your recommender valuable time by providing a single set of recommendation questions for each participating school. This allows your recommender to use the same answers for multiple letter submissions, alleviating the workload of having to answer different questions for each school multiple times. You benefit because it makes the ask for several different letters to be written on your behalf much easier. In addition, translated copied of the standard questions are available in several other languages that you can provide to your recommender as support.
Now for the fine print – under the Family Educational Rights Act of 1974, students have access to their educational record, including letters of recommendation. However, students may waive their right to see letters of evaluation. Recommenders will be notified if you have waived your right to see the letter or not before they submit.

QUESTIONS

Section 1 – Recommender Information

  • Context of Relationship
  • Nature of relationship
  • How long have you known the applicant?
  • During which period of time have you had the most frequent contact with the applicant? From: To:
  • If you are affiliated with the Tepper School of Business or Carnegie Mellon University, please select the option that most closely matches.
  • May we contact you regarding this applicant?
  • Did you use a translator?

Section 2

In this section, you will find 12 competencies and character traits that contribute to successful leadership. The competencies and character traits are grouped into five categories:

– Achievement

– Influence

– People

– Personal Qualities

– Cognitive Abilities

For each competency, please select the one button that corresponds to the behavior that you have seen the applicant most consistently exhibit. We acknowledge that all applicants have both areas of strength and areas of development. Your candid and honest appraisal will assist in evaluation of the applicant. Please assume that each level builds upon behaviors of the previous level.

Achievement

1. Initiative: Acts ahead of need/anticipates problems

0-No basis for judgment

1-Reluctant to take on new tasks; waits to be told what to do; defers to others

2-Willing to step in and take charge when required to do so

3-Takes charge spontaneously when problem needs attention

4-Volunteers for new work challenges; proactively puts in extra effort to accomplish critical or difficult tasks

5-Proactively seeks high-impact projects; steps up to challenges even when things are not going well

2. Results Orientation: Focuses on and drives toward delivering on goals, objectives, and performance improvement

0-No basis for judgment

1-Focuses on fulfilling activities at hand; unsure how work relates to goals

2-Takes actions to overcome obstacles to achieve goals

3-Independently acts to exceed goals and plans for contingencies

4-Documents activities and outcomes to learn from past; introduces incremental improvements to raise the effectiveness of team

5-Invents new approaches with measurably better results; works to deliver best-in-class performance improvements

Influence

3. Communication, Professional Impression & Poise: Delivers messages and ideas in a way that engages an audience and achieves buy-in; uses listening and other attending behaviors to reach shared understanding; remains calm and measured even in time of crisis or conflict

0-No basis for judgment

1-Struggles to get point across; neglects to understand audience’s input or perspective; lacks confidence and gets flustered under pressure

2-Works to get point across; acknowledges feedback; reframes statements when necessary to make them clearer; speaks politely; remains composed in known circumstances

3-Present views clearly and logically structures content for a broad audience; listens and responds to feedback; prepares in advance to appear confident; leaves a positive and professional impression; responds confidently in unfamiliar situations

4-Uses tailored language that appeals to specific groups; restates what others have said to check for understanding; comes across as confident; responds rapidly and strongly to crisis; looked to for advice and guidance

5-Structures content for senior-level meetings; maintains composure when challenged; solicits opinions and concerns, discusses them openly and adjusts communication; remains cool under pressure during conflict or crisis; channels emotion into positive action

4. Influence and Collaboration: Engages and works with people over whom one has no direct control

0-No basis for judgment

1-Does not seek input and perspective of others

2-Accepts input from others and engages them in problem solving

3-Seeks first to understand perspectives of others; takes actions to gain their support for ideas and initiatives

4-Uses tailored approaches to connect with others, influence, and achieve results

5-Uses tailored influence approaches to create and leverage a network of strategically chosen individuals to improve collective outcomes

People

5. Respect for Others: Acknowledges the value of others’ views and actions

0-No basis for judgment

1-Unwilling to acknowledge others’ points of view

2-Open to considering others’ views when confronted or offered

3-Invites input from others because of expressed respect for them and their views

4-Praises people publicly for their good actions; ensures that others’ opinions are heard before their own

5-Uses empathy and personal experience to resolve conflicts and foster mutual respect; reinforces respect with public praise when individuals solicit and use input from others

6. Team Leadership: Manages and empowers a team of formal or informal direct reports, including virtual teams

0-No basis for judgment

1-Struggles to delegate effectively (e.g. micromanages); does not organize activities or provide appropriate information to complete tasks

2-Assigns tasks and tells people what to do; checks when they are done

3-Solicits ideas and perspectives from the team; structures activities; holds members accountable

4-Actively engages the team to develop plans and resolve issues through collaboration; shows the impact of individual/team contributions

5-Recruits others into duties or roles based on insight into individual abilities; rewards those who exceed expectations; provides strong organizational support

7. Developing Others: Helps people develop their performance and ability over time

0-No basis for judgment

1-Focuses only on one’s own growth; critical of others’ efforts to develop

2-Encourages people to develop; points out mistakes to help people develop and praises them for improvements

3-Gives specific positive and negative behavioral feedback to support the development of others

4-Provides overarching practical guiding principles and recommendations that are applicable in multiple situations to direct or focus efforts on specific areas of development

5-Identifies potential in others; inspires others to develop by providing feedback, mentoring/coaching, and identifying new growth opportunities as well as supporting their effort to change

Personal Qualities

8. Trustworthiness/ Integrity: Acts consistently in line with or follows explicit values, beliefs or intentions

0-No basis for judgment

1-Follows the crowd; takes path of least resistance; gives in under pressure

2-Acts consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs when it is easy to do so

3-Acts spontaneously and consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs despite opposition

4-Initiates actions based on values or beliefs even though the actions may come with reputational risk; demonstrates the values of the team or organization publicly

5-Demonstrates high personal integrity even at personal cost; holds people accountable to the team or organizational values

9. Adaptability/ Resilience: Adapts to changing demands and circumstances without difficulty. Maintains calm optimism in the face of challenge, problems, or apparent failure

0-No basis for judgment

1-Prefers existing ways of doing things; fears failure; becomes anxious under challenging situations

2-Adapts to new methods and procedures when required to do so; remains calm in unfamiliar situations until confronted with obstacle

3-Champions adoption of new initiatives and processes; exhibits level-headedness in most environments including challenging ones; persists until obstacle is overcome

4-Seeks out disruptions as an opportunity for improvement; remains optimistic and forward-looking in difficult situations that may result in failure

5-Energized by projects with high uncertainty but potential for high reward; seeks to be the first into unknown or unfamiliar situations; welcomes learning opportunities created by failure; learns from mistakes and rebounds quickly from setbacks

10. Self Awareness: Aware of and seeks out additional input on own strengths and weaknesses

0-No basis for judgment

1-Lacks awareness of how he/she is perceived; denies or offers excuses when confronted

2-Acknowledges fault or performance problem when confronted with concrete example or data

3-Describes own key strengths and weaknesses accurately; welcomes feedback from others and discusses opportunities to change with select individuals

4-Actively seeks out feedback to explicitly address desired improvement areas or build on strengths; explores reasons for problems openly, including own faults

5-Seeks out challenging and potentially risky experiences to improve; identifies and engages with resources—people, processes, or content—to maximize strengths or mitigate weaknesses

Cognitive

11. Problem Solving: Frames problems, analyzes situations, identifies key issues, conducts analysis on the issues, and produces acceptable solution

0-No basis for judgment

1-Avoids problems; when faced with problems, sticks to what worked before, or chooses an obvious path

2-Offers solutions when the risk is low; focuses on immediate, short-term implications instead of the big picture

3-Looks beyond the obvious; identifies and focuses on the critical information needed to understand a problem, identifies root cause(s), and comes up with reasonable solutions

4-Gathers and analyzes key information using complex methods or several layers deep; integrates perspectives from a variety of sources to arrive at unexpected but practical and effective solutions

5-Applies logic to break complex problems down into manageable parts or sub-problems; solves tough and interconnected problems and can explain how the pieces are connected

12. Strategic Orientation: Thinks beyond one’s span of control and into the future to reshape the approach or scope of work

0-No basis for judgment

1-Focuses on completing work without understanding implications

2-Understands immediate issues or implications of work or analysis

3-Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have improved near-term business performance

4-Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have shaped team/organization strategy and will have impact on long-term business performance

5-Develops insights or recommendations beyond area of responsibility with impact on long-term business strategy and performance

(Optional) Is there anything about your competency ratings on which you’d like to comment? (textbox)

Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this candidate compared to her/his peer group? (select)

Overall, I … (select)

Section 3

Please answer the following questions and provide specific examples where possible.

1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization. (Recommended word count: 50 words) (textbox)

2. How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? (E.g. what are the applicant’s principal strengths?) (Recommended word count: 500 words) (textbox)

3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (Recommended word count: 500 words) (textbox)

INSTRUCTIONS

Request Letters of Reference (LORs) from people who can comment on your qualifications for Tuck’s admissions criteria. The best letters come from references who can demonstrate that you are smart, accomplished, aware, and encouraging. If possible, your current direct supervisor should write one of your LORs. You will be asked to provide a brief explanation if you cannot provide an LOR from a direct supervisor. LORs from professors who did not supervise professional work, from family members, or from personal acquaintances, do not enhance your candidacy.

You must submit two LORs. Reapplicants who applied during the previous year need to submit only one new LOR from a reference who did not write to Tuck on your behalf last year.

Your reference must be the sole author of your LOR. Drafting, writing, translating, or submitting your own reference, even if asked to do so by your reference, violates Tuck’s admissions policies and Academic Honor Principle. You are responsible for informing your references of this policy.

References who cannot write in English may write in a native language and have the LOR translated by an outside translation service. Do not translate the LOR into English for your reference.

You are responsible for notifying your references of your application deadline and ensuring your LORs are submitted on time. We review your application only if both LORs are received by your application deadline. Otherwise, we will move your application to the next admission round. If you would like to make changes to your list of references, please contact us.

Tuck has adopted the questions posed by the Common Letter of Recommendation.

QUESTIONS

Tuck has adopted the essay questions posed by the Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC) Common Letter of Recommendation. Please respond to the following questions in the space below.

1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization.

2. How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? (E.g. what are the applicant’s principal strengths?)

3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response.

4. Is there anything else we should know?

(textbox, no specific limit)

INSTRUCTIONS

We require two letters of recommendations from individuals who are well acquainted with your performance in a work setting, preferably from a current or former supervisor.
The title or position of the evaluator is not as important as his/her ability to comment knowledgeably and specifically about you. Submit recommendations from people who can speak directly about your aptitudes and capabilities.
Go to the Recommender section of the MBA Application Instructions to see the questions asked of recommenders and for more details.
It is possible that after having selected your recommenders, to alter this selection. If the recommender has not submitted a recommendation, you can change the recommender by clicking the Manage your Recommenders’ button below. You cannot change a recommender once he/she has completed and submitted their recommendation.
Please also note that this page cannot be updated directly and will not reflect any changes made to the recommender’s name or email address on the activities page. However this system will capture the updated information as well as send an email to the new recommender if the email address is updated.
The people submitting reference letters on your behalf should submit their letters to our admissions office electronically through our application system.
You must enter the names and contact information for each recommendation provider.

QUESTIONS

Recommender Information

Relationship With Applicant – Please answer this question accurately (e.g., direct supervisor, indirect supervisor, colleague, peer, mentor). Deliberate misrepresentation of recommender-applicant relationship may jeopardize any offer of admission to the applicant. __________________

During which period of time have you had the most frequent contact with the applicant? From ______ To ______

Are you a graduate of Wharton or any other University of Pennsylvania school? (Yes/No)

Are you a faculty member of Wharton or any other University of Pennsylvania School? (Yes/No)

Summary Appraisal

Please look at this list of personality characteristics and choose up to two traits that you feel best represent the candidate you are recommending to the Wharton MBA Program. (TIP – You do not have to choose two, only up to two.): Determined, Humble, Disciplined, Engaged, Intellectually Curious,Analytical, Flexible, Persistent, Conscientious, Results Oriented

1 (select from the characteristics above)

2 (select from the characteristics above)

Please look at this list of personality characteristics and choose up to two traits that you feel best represent the candidate you are recommending to the Wharton MBA Program. (TIP – You do not have to choose two, only up to two.): Collaborative, Persuasive, Innovative, Confident, Self-Aware, Professional, Resilient, Energetic, Emotionally Stable, Agreeable

1 (select from the characteristics above)

2 (select from the characteristics above)

Applicant Assessment

Please provide example(s) that illustrate why you believe this candidate will meaningfully contribute to the Wharton MBA community. (Word count: 300) (textbox, 7500 characters max)

Please provide example(s) that illustrate why you believe this candidate will find success throughout their career. (Word count: 300) (textbox, 7500 characters max)

(Optional) Is there anything else we should know? (textbox, 7500 characters max)

INSTRUCTIONS

List two (2) individuals who will provide professional recommendations for you. At least one of the recommenders should be in a position to assess your performance at your most recent job. Once you have entered the required recommender information, click the “Send to Recommender” button to email the online recommendation form to your recommender.
To help you find recommenders who can speak to your past experiences, we accept letters written in English, Spanish, and Chinese. Yale SOM Admissions will be responsible for translating letters written in Spanish and Chinese.
To ensure the objectivity and independence of your recommendations, the written product must be entirely the work of your recommenders. Although you may discuss the recommendations with them, you may not have any involvement in drafting or submitting your letters of recommendation.

QUESTIONS

Recommender Information

  • Context of Relationship (select)
  • Nature of relationship (select)
  • Did you use a translator? (Select)

Leadership Assessment

In this section, you will find 12 competencies and character traits that contribute to successful leadership. The competencies and character traits are grouped into five categories:

– Achievement
– Influence
– People
– Personal Qualities
– Cognitive Abilities

For each competency, please select the one button that corresponds to the behavior that you have seen the applicant most consistently exhibit. We acknowledge that all applicants have both areas of strength and areas of development. Your candid and honest appraisal will assist in evaluation of the applicant. Please assume that each level builds upon behaviors of the previous level.

Achievement

1. Initiative: Acts ahead of need/anticipates problems

  • No basis for judgment
  • Reluctant to take on new tasks; waits to be told what to do; defers to others
  • Willing to step in and take charge when required to do so
  • Takes charge spontaneously when problem needs attention
  • Volunteers for new work challenges; proactively puts in extra effort to accomplish critical or difficult tasks
  • Proactively seeks high-impact projects; steps up to challenges even when things are not going well

2. Results Orientation: Focuses on and drives toward delivering on goals, objectives, and performance improvement

  • No basis for judgment
  • Focuses on fulfilling activities at hand; unsure how work relates to goals
  • Takes actions to overcome obstacles to achieve goals
  • Independently acts to exceed goals and plans for contingencies
  • Documents activities and outcomes to learn from past; introduces incremental improvements to raise the effectiveness of team
  • Invents new approaches with measurably better results; works to deliver best-in-class performance improvements

Influence

3. Communication, Professional Impression & Poise: Delivers messages and ideas in a way that engages an audience and achieves buy-in; uses listening and other attending behaviors to reach shared understanding; remains calm and measured even in time of crisis or conflict

  • No basis for judgment
  • Struggles to get point across; neglects to understand audience’s input or perspective; lacks confidence and gets flustered under pressure
  • Works to get point across; acknowledges feedback; reframes statements when necessary to make them clearer; speaks politely; remains composed in known circumstances
  • Present views clearly and logically structures content for a broad audience; listens and responds to feedback; prepares in advance to appear confident; leaves a positive and professional impression; responds confidently in unfamiliar situations
  • Uses tailored language that appeals to specific groups; restates what others have said to check for understanding; comes across as confident; responds rapidly and strongly to crisis; looked to for advice and guidance
  • Structures content for senior-level meetings; maintains composure when challenged; solicits opinions and concerns, discusses them openly and adjusts communication; remains cool under pressure during conflict or crisis; channels emotion into positive action

4. Influence and Collaboration: Engages and works with people over whom one has no direct control

  • No basis for judgment
  • Does not seek input and perspective of others
  • Accepts input from others and engages them in problem solving
  • Seeks first to understand perspectives of others; takes actions to gain their support for ideas and initiatives
  • Uses tailored approaches to connect with others, influence, and achieve results
  • Uses tailored influence approaches to create and leverage a network of strategically chosen individuals to improve collective outcomes
    People

5. Respect for Others: Acknowledges the value of others’ views and actions

  • No basis for judgment
  • Unwilling to acknowledge others’ points of view
  • Open to considering others’ views when confronted or offered
  • Invites input from others because of expressed respect for them and their views
  • Praises people publicly for their good actions; ensures that others’ opinions are heard before their own
  • Uses empathy and personal experience to resolve conflicts and foster mutual respect; reinforces respect with public praise when individuals solicit and use input from others

6. Team Leadership: Manages and empowers a team of formal or informal direct reports, including virtual teams

  • No basis for judgment
  • Struggles to delegate effectively (e.g. micromanages); does not organize activities or provide appropriate information to complete tasks
  • Assigns tasks and tells people what to do; checks when they are done
  • Solicits ideas and perspectives from the team; structures activities; holds members accountable
  • Actively engages the team to develop plans and resolve issues through collaboration; shows the impact of individual/team contributions
  • Recruits others into duties or roles based on insight into individual abilities; rewards those who exceed expectations; provides strong organizational support

7. Developing Others: Helps people develop their performance and ability over time

  • No basis for judgment
  • Focuses only on one’s own growth; critical of others’ efforts to develop
  • Encourages people to develop; points out mistakes to help people develop and praises them for improvements
  • Gives specific positive and negative behavioral feedback to support the development of others
  • Provides overarching practical guiding principles and recommendations that are applicable in multiple situations to direct or focus efforts on specific areas of development
  • Identifies potential in others; inspires others to develop by providing feedback, mentoring/coaching, and identifying new growth opportunities as well as supporting their effort to change

Personal Qualities

8. Trustworthiness/ Integrity: Acts consistently in line with or follows explicit values, beliefs or intentions

  • No basis for judgment
  • Follows the crowd; takes path of least resistance; gives in under pressure
  • Acts consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs when it is easy to do so
  • Acts spontaneously and consistently with stated intentions, values, or beliefs despite opposition
  • Initiates actions based on values or beliefs even though the actions may come with reputational risk; demonstrates the values of the team or organization publicly
  • Demonstrates high personal integrity even at personal cost; holds people accountable to the team or organizational values

9. Adaptability/ Resilience: Adapts to changing demands and circumstances without difficulty. Maintains calm optimism in the face of challenge, problems, or apparent failure

  • No basis for judgment
  • Prefers existing ways of doing things; fears failure; becomes anxious under challenging situations
  • Adapts to new methods and procedures when required to do so; remains calm in unfamiliar situations until confronted with obstacle
  • Champions adoption of new initiatives and processes; exhibits level-headedness in most environments including challenging ones; persists until obstacle is overcome
  • Seeks out disruptions as an opportunity for improvement; remains optimistic and forward-looking in difficult situations that may result in failure
  • Energized by projects with high uncertainty but potential for high reward; seeks to be the first into unknown or unfamiliar situations; welcomes learning opportunities created by failure; learns from mistakes and rebounds quickly from setbacks

10. Self Awareness: Aware of and seeks out additional input on own strengths and weaknesses

  • No basis for judgment
  • Lacks awareness of how he/she is perceived; denies or offers excuses when confronted
  • Acknowledges fault or performance problem when confronted with concrete example or data
  • Describes own key strengths and weaknesses accurately; welcomes feedback from others and discusses opportunities to change with select individuals
  • Actively seeks out feedback to explicitly address desired improvement areas or build on strengths; explores reasons for problems openly, including own faults
  • Seeks out challenging and potentially risky experiences to improve; identifies and engages with resources—people, processes, or content—to maximize strengths or mitigate weaknesses

Cognitive

11. Problem Solving: Frames problems, analyzes situations, identifies key issues, conducts analysis on the issues, and produces acceptable solution

  • No basis for judgment
  • Avoids problems; when faced with problems, sticks to what worked before, or chooses an obvious path
  • Offers solutions when the risk is low; focuses on immediate, short-term implications instead of the big picture
  • Looks beyond the obvious; identifies and focuses on the critical information needed to understand a problem, identifies root cause(s), and comes up with reasonable solutions
  • Gathers and analyzes key information using complex methods or several layers deep; integrates perspectives from a variety of sources to arrive at unexpected but practical and effective solutions
  • Applies logic to break complex problems down into manageable parts or sub-problems; solves tough and interconnected problems and can explain how the pieces are connected

12. Strategic Orientation: Thinks beyond one’s span of control and into the future to reshape the approach or scope of work

  • No basis for judgment
  • Focuses on completing work without understanding implications
  • Understands immediate issues or implications of work or analysis
  • Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have improved near-term business performance
  • Develops insights or recommendations within area of responsibility that have shaped team/organization strategy and will have impact on long-term business performance
  • Develops insights or recommendations beyond area of responsibility with impact on long-term business strategy and performance

Based on your professional experience, how do you rate this candidate compared to her/his peer group? (select)

Overall, I … (select)

Qualities Assessment

Below is a list of some of the qualities that describe Yale SOM students and alumni. Please review the list and check off the three (3) qualities on the list that you feel best describe the applicant. Please note that we are not looking for any specific qualities; instead, we are simply trying to get a better sense of the applicant’s strengths.

  • Adaptable
  • Analytical
  • Creative
  • Curious
  • Hard-working
  • Humble
  • Intuitive
  • Level-headed
  • Open-minded
  • Persistent
  • Positive
  • Resilient
  • Responsible
  • Self-motivated
  • Smart
  • Socially adept

Letter of Recommendation

Please write an assessment of the applicant that addresses the prompts below. We are looking for your candid and accurate assessment of the applicant’s potential to be a successful leader and the specific traits the applicant possesses that evidence this potential. Please be as specific as possible and use concrete examples where applicable. Do not incorporate anything drafted by the candidate in your recommendation or have the candidate submit the recommendation on your behalf.

Please note that Yale SOM welcomes you to upload and submit letters of recommendation written in English, Chinese (Mandarin), or Spanish. Yale University will translate the letter to English for admissions review.

1. Please provide a brief description of your interaction with the applicant and, if applicable, the applicant’s role in your organization. (Recommended word count: 50 words)

2. How does the performance of the applicant compare to that of other well-qualified individuals in similar roles? (E.g. what are the applicant’s principal strengths?) (Recommended word count: 500 words)

3. Describe the most important piece of constructive feedback you have given the applicant. Please detail the circumstances and the applicant’s response. (Recommended word count: 500 words)

4. Are you in a position to know whether the applicant is sponsored for the MBA by his or her current employer? If so, please comment.

5. (Optional) Is there anything else we should know?

I am submitting my recommendation letter in this language:

  • English
  • Chinese
  • Spanish

Upload a PDF or Word document here.